ArticleSpinal cord series and cases2018
Effectiveness of two vitamin D
Article in Spinal cord series and cases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of vitamin D on the prognosis after spinal cord injury: A systematic review.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Pooled it
- Strategies to mitigate muscle mass loss in individuals with spinal cord injury.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2026Review
- 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Levels and Vitamin D3 Supplementation During Postacute Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation.Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation · 2024Observational
- Prevalence of an insufficient vitamin D status at the onset of a spinal cord injury - a cross-sectional study.Spinal cord · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designProspective case series.
objectivesTo assess the effectiveness and safety of two vitamin D
settingPublicly-funded intensive inpatient rehabilitation center, Montreal, Canada.
methodsThirty adults with recent SCI complete or incomplete sensorimotor impairments were recruited upon admission from designated regional SCI trauma centers. Participants with serum 25OHD ≤ 30 nmol/L were given 10,000 IU of weekly and 1000 IU of daily vitamin D
resultsAt baseline, 34 and 66% of participants had serum 25OHD < 30 and >30 nmol/L. Both protocols induced a rise in serum 25OHD with a greater increase in the HD vs. LD regimen (31.4 [95% CI: 16.7, 46.0] vs. 11.7 nmol/L [95% CI: 2.2, 21.2]). None of the participants given the HD remained vitamin D deficient, but only one achieved vitamin D sufficiency. Nearly all individuals on the LD regimen remained vitamin D insufficient with only two reaching vitamin D sufficiency. No adverse effects were observed over the course of the supplementation.
conclusionsAlthough 1000 IU of daily vitamin D
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.