Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30393454›Full record

ArticleBiodiversity data journal2018

Resolving "orphaned" non-specific structures using machine learning and natural language processing methods.

Dongfang Xu, Steven S Chong, Thomas Rodenhausen, Hong Cui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biodiversity data journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dongfang XuUniversity of Arizona, Tucson, United States of America University of Arizona Tucson United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0828-1102
Steven S ChongUniversity of Arizona, Tucson, United States of America University of Arizona Tucson United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1264-1166
Thomas RodenhausenUniversity of Arizona, Tucson, United States of America University of Arizona Tucson United States of America.
Hong CuiUniversity of Arizona, Tucson, United States of America University of Arizona Tucson United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scholarly publications of biodiversity literature contain a vast amount of information in human readable format. The detailed morphological descriptions in these publications contain rich information that can be extracted to facilitate analysis and computational biology research. However, the idiosyncrasies of morphological descriptions still pose a number of challenges to machines. In this work, we demonstrate the use of two different approaches to resolve meronym (i.e. part-of) relations between anatomical parts and their anchor organs, including a syntactic rule-based approach and a SVM-based (support vector machine) method. Both methods made use of domain ontologies. We compared the two approaches with two other baseline methods and the evaluation results show the syntactic methods (92.1% F1 score) outperformed the SVM methods (80.7% F1 score) and the part-of ontologies were valuable knowledge sources for the task. It is notable that the mistakes made by the two approaches rarely overlapped. Additional tests will be conducted on the development version of the Explorer of Taxon Concepts toolkit before we make the functionality publicly available. Meanwhile, we will further investigate and leverage the complementary nature of the two approaches to further drive down the error rate, as in practical application, even a 1% error rate could lead to hundreds of errors.

Indexed as

Anaphora ResolutionBiodiversity LiteratureInformation ExtractionMachine LearningMorphological DescriptionsOntology ApplicationPerformance Evaluation

Identifiers

PMID30393454
PMCPMC6207837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.