Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30393347›Full record

ArticleMicromachines2018

3D Printing Solutions for Microfluidic Chip-To-World Connections.

Sander van den Driesche, Frieder Lucklum, Frank Bunge, Michael J Vellekoop

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Augmented 3D Printing for Multiscale Microphysiological Systems.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Polymeric Microfluidic Fuel Cells with Controlled Printed Patterns.3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. A Review of Microfluidic Experimental Designs for Nanoparticle Synthesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Digital Manufacturing for Microfluidics.Annual review of biomedical engineering · 2019
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sander van den DriescheInstitute for Microsensors, -actuators and ⁻systems (IMSAS), University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany. sdriesche@uni-bremen.de.
Frieder LucklumInstitute for Microsensors, -actuators and ⁻systems (IMSAS), University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany. flucklum@imsas.uni-bremen.de.ORCID 0000-0002-6500-3531
Frank BungeInstitute for Microsensors, -actuators and ⁻systems (IMSAS), University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany. fbunge@imsas.uni-bremen.de.ORCID 0000-0002-5309-1140
Michael J VellekoopInstitute for Microsensors, -actuators and ⁻systems (IMSAS), University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany. mvellekoop@imsas.uni-bremen.de.
University of Bremen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The connection of microfluidic devices to the outer world by tubes and wires is an underestimated issue. We present methods based on 3D printing to realize microfluidic chip holders with reliable fluidic and electric connections. The chip holders are constructed by microstereolithography, an additive manufacturing technique with sub-millimeter resolution. The fluidic sealing between the chip and holder is achieved by placing O-rings, partly integrated into the 3D-printed structure. The electric connection of bonding pads located on microfluidic chips is realized by spring-probes fitted within the printed holder. Because there is no gluing or wire bonding necessary, it is easy to change the chip in the measurement setup. The spring probes and O-rings are aligned automatically because of their fixed position within the holder. In the case of bioanalysis applications such as cells, a limitation of 3D-printed objects is the leakage of cytotoxic residues from the printing material, cured resin. This was solved by coating the 3D-printed structures with parylene-C. The combination of silicon/glass microfluidic chips fabricated with highly-reliable clean-room technology and 3D-printed chip holders for the chip-to-world connection is a promising solution for applications where biocompatibility, optical transparency and accurate sample handling must be assured. 3D printing technology for such applications will eventually arise, enabling the fabrication of complete microfluidic devices.

Indexed as

3D printingchip-holderfluidic and electric connectionsmicrofluidicsstereolithography

Identifiers

PMID30393347
PMCPMC6187806
OpenAlexW2792606774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.