Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30392855›Full record

ArticleArchives of physical medicine and rehabilitation2019

"Look, Your Muscles Are Firing!": A Qualitative Study of Clinician Perspectives on the Use of Surface Electromyography in Neurorehabilitation.

Heather A Feldner, Darrin Howell, Valerie E Kelly, Sarah Westcott McCoy, Katherine M Steele

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Current developments in surface electromyography.Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Heather A FeldnerDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. Electronic address: hfeldner@uw.edu.
Darrin HowellDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Valerie E KellyDivision of Physical Therapy, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Sarah Westcott McCoyDivision of Physical Therapy, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Katherine M SteeleDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
University of Washington · US

Funding

SCH: Ubiquitous rehabilitation to improve movement after neurologic injury R01EB021935 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI STEELE, KATHERINE M · 2015 to 2018
$1.6M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB021935
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the perceived value, benefits, drawbacks, and ideas for technology development and implementation of surface electromyography recordings in neurologic rehabilitation practice from clinical stakeholder perspectives.

designA qualitative, phenomenological study was conducted. In-depth, semistructured interviews and focus groups were completed. Sessions included questions about clinician perspectives and demonstrations of surface electromyography systems to garner perceptions of specific system features.

settingThe study was conducted at hospital systems in a large metropolitan area.

participantsAdult and pediatric physical therapists, occupational therapists, and physiatrists from inpatient, outpatient, and research settings (N=22) took part in the study.

interventionsNot applicable.

main outcome measuresInterviews and focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, then coded for analysis into themes.

resultsFour major themes emerged: (1) low-tech clinical practice and future directions for rehabilitation; (2) barriers to surface electromyography uptake and potential solutions; (3) benefits of surface electromyography for targeted populations; and (4) essential features of surface electromyography systems.

conclusionsSurface electromyography systems were not routinely utilized for assessment or intervention following neurologic injury. Despite recognition of potential clinical benefits of surface electromyography use, clinicians identified limited time and resources as key barriers to implementation. Perspectives on design and surface electromyography system features indicated the need for streamlined, intuitive, and clinically effective applications. Further research is needed to determine feasibility and clinical relevance of surface electromyography in rehabilitation intervention.

Indexed as

AdultAttitude of Health PersonnelElectromyographyFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeurological RehabilitationOccupational TherapistsPhysiatristsPhysical TherapistsQualitative ResearchNeurological rehabilitationOccupational therapistsPhysical therapistsQualitative researchSurface electromyographyTechnology

Identifiers

PMID30392855
PMCPMC6435407
OpenAlexW2898084387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.