Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30392803›Full record

SynthesisJournal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR2018

Cost-Effectiveness of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt versus Large-Volume Paracentesis in Refractory Ascites: Results of a Markov Model Incorporating Individual Patient-Level Meta-Analysis and Nationally Representative Cost Data.

Sharon W Kwan, Stephen K Allison, Laura S Gold, David S Shin

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Drainage of ascites in cirrhosis.World journal of hepatology · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sharon W KwanComparative Effectiveness, Cost, and Outcomes Research Center, Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Washington Medical Center, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA 98195.
Stephen K AllisonDepartment of Interventional Radiology, University of Washington Medical Center, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA 98195. Electronic address: sallison@uw.edu.
Laura S GoldComparative Effectiveness, Cost, and Outcomes Research Center, Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
David S ShinDepartment of Interventional Radiology, University of Washington Medical Center, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA 98195.

Funding

Institute of Translational Health SciencesKL2TR000421 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DISIS, MARY L. · 2012 to 2016
$12.6M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000421
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare relative cost-effectiveness of serial large-volume paracentesis (LVP) and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation for treatment of refractory ascites. MATERIALS AND

methodsA decisional Markov model was developed to estimate payer cost and quality-adjusted life-ears (QALYs) associated with LVP and TIPS treatment strategies for cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites. Survival estimates were derived from an individual patient-level meta-analysis of prospective randomized clinical trials. Health utilities for potential health states were derived from a prospective study of patients with cirrhosis. Cost data were derived from national representative claims databases (MarketScan and Medicare) and included reimbursement amounts for relevant procedures, hospitalizations, and outpatient pharmaceutical costs. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.

resultsLVP resulted in 1.72 QALYs gained at a cost of $41,391, whereas TIPS resulted in 2.76 QALYs gained at a cost of $100,538. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of TIPS versus LVP was $57,003/QALY. At a willingness-to-pay ratio of $100,000/QALY, TIPS has a 62% probability of being acceptable compared with LVP.

conclusionsThis study suggests that TIPS should be considered cost-effective in a country that places a relatively high value on health improvements but less so in countries with lower levels of health care resources.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsModels, EconomicAmbulatory CareAscitesClinical Decision-MakingCost-Benefit AnalysisDecision Support TechniquesDrug CostsHospital CostsHumansLiver CirrhosisMarkov ChainsParacentesisPortasystemic Shunt, Transjugular IntrahepaticQuality-Adjusted Life YearsRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID30392803
PMCPMC6334842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.