Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30392736›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of emergency medicine2019

Use of a Rapid Diagnostic for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae for Women in the Emergency Department Can Improve Clinical Management: Report of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Charlotte A Gaydos, Michele-Corinne Ako, Mitra Lewis, Yu-Hsiang Hsieh, Richard E Rothman, Andrea F Dugas

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of emergency medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04793750 (Ending the HIV Epidemic Through Point-of-Care Technologies), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04793750 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Ending the HIV Epidemic Through Point-of-Care Technologies (EHPOC): Performance Evaluation of Novel POC HIV Tests in Baltimore

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohns Hopkins UniversityRan2021 to 2025Enrolled224ConditionsHIV Infections, SyphilisArmsCepheid GeneXpert HIV-1 Qual POC HIV VL test, DPP HIV-Syphilis test system, OraQuick
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Sex disparities in chlamydia and gonorrhea treatment in U.S. adult emergency departments: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Visual and rapid identification ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  18. Impact of risk-based sexually transmitted infection screening in the emergency department.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Charlotte A GaydosDivision of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. Electronic address: cgaydos@jhmi.edu.
Michele-Corinne AkoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Mitra LewisDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Yu-Hsiang HsiehDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Richard E RothmanDivision of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Andrea F DugasDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

LC: HIV Prevention Trials Network - Laboratory Support for the SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence Study (CoVPN 5002)UM1AI068613 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SUSAN H ESHLEMAN, Mark A Marzinke · 2011 to 2026
$100.2M
TrainingU54EB007958 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Matthew Hamill · 2007 to 2026
$34.6M
Technology development for point-of-care detection and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Neisseria gonorrhoeaeR01AI138978 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, TZA-HUEI JEFF · 2018 to 2021
$5.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI138978NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068613NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB007958
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectiveIn emergency departments (EDs), diagnosis and treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae are challenging. We conducted a randomized clinical trial to assess rapid C trachomatis and N gonorrhoeae testing on overtreatment and undertreatment of women evaluated for C trachomatis and N gonorrhoeae.

methodsWomen undergoing pelvic examinations and C trachomatis and N gonorrhoeae testing (n=254) were randomized to control or rapid test groups. The control group received standard-of-care C trachomatis and N gonorrhoeae nucleic acid amplification tests of endocervical specimens, with 2- to 3-day turnaround times. For the rapid test group, clinicians collected an extra endocervical swab for GeneXpert C trachomatis and N gonorrhoeae rapid testing, in addition to the standard-of-care nucleic acid amplification test swab. Rapid results were immediately provided, and all patients were treated according to providers' clinical judgment.

resultsIn the rapid test group, 7.9% of patients had positive test results for C trachomatis; 3.9% had positive test results for N gonorrhoeae. In the control standard-of-care group, 10.2% of patients had positive nucleic acid amplification test results for C trachomatis; 5.5% had positive results for N gonorrhoeae. Undertreatment for both C trachomatis and N gonorrhoeae in the ED was 0% for the rapid test group and 43.8% for the control standard-of-care group. Clinicians overtreated 46.5% of uninfected standard-of-care control patients for C trachomatis compared with 23.1% of uninfected rapid test patients. For patients uninfected with N gonorrhoeae, clinicians overtreated 46.7% of standard-of-care control patients compared with 25.4% of rapid test patients. The length of stay did not differ significantly between groups.

conclusionRapid C trachomatis and N gonorrhoeae testing in the ED led to a significant reduction in overtreatment for women without infections compared with the standard-of-care control group. Additionally, in the rapid test group there was significant improvement in appropriate treatment for patients with infections.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCervix UteriChlamydia InfectionsChlamydia trachomatisEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleGonorrheaHumansLength of StayMedical OveruseMiddle AgedNeisseria gonorrhoeaeNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPrevalenceProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID30392736
PMCPMC6494710
OpenAlexW2898925048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.