Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30392733›Full record

ArticleAnnals of emergency medicine2019

Antibiotic Prescriptions Associated With Dental-Related Emergency Department Visits.

Rebecca M Roberts, Adam L Hersh, Daniel J Shapiro, Katherine E Fleming-Dutra, Lauri A Hicks

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of emergency medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Management of acute dental pain in adults.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Evaluation of outpatient clindamycin prescriptions across a large military healthcare network.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca M RobertsOffice of Antibiotic Stewardship, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Atlanta, GA. Electronic address: rmroberts@cdc.gov.
Adam L HershPediatric Infectious Diseases, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Daniel J ShapiroBoston Combined Residency Program in Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Katherine E Fleming-DutraOffice of Antibiotic Stewardship, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Atlanta, GA.
Lauri A HicksOffice of Antibiotic Stewardship, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Atlanta, GA.
National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases · USBoston Children's Hospital · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectiveThe frequency of antibiotic prescribing and types of antibiotics prescribed for dental conditions presenting to the emergency department (ED) is not well known. The objective of this study is to quantify how often and which dental diagnoses made in the ED resulted in an antibiotic prescription.

methodsFrom 2011 to 2015, there were an estimated 2.2 million (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9 to 2.5 million) ED visits per year for dental-related conditions, which accounted for 1.6% (95% CI 1.5% to 1.7%) of ED visits. This is based on an unweighted 2,125 observations from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey in which a dental-related diagnosis was made.

resultsAn antibiotic, most often a narrow-spectrum penicillin or clindamycin, was prescribed in 65% (95% CI 61% to 68%) of ED visits with any dental diagnosis. The most common dental diagnoses for all ages were unspecified disorder of the teeth and supporting structures (44%; 95% CI 41% to 48%; International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification[ICD-9-CM] code 525.9), periapical abscess without sinus (21%; 95% CI 18% to 25%; ICD-9-CM code 522.5), and dental caries (18%; 95% CI 15% to 22%; ICD-9-CM code 521.0). Recommended treatments for these conditions are usually dental procedures rather than antibiotics.

conclusionThe common use of antibiotics for dental conditions in the ED may indicate the need for greater access to both preventive and urgent care from dentists and other related specialists as well as the need for clearer clinical guidance and provider education related to oral infections.

Indexed as

AdolescentAmbulatory CareAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildClindamycinDelivery of Health CareDental CariesEmergency Service, HospitalHealth Care SurveysHumansPenicillinsPeriapical AbscessPrescriptionsStomatognathic DiseasesUnited StatesAnti-Bacterial AgentsClindamycinPenicillins

Identifiers

PMID30392733
PMCPMC6943909
OpenAlexW2899443086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.