ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2018
Effect of methyl substituents in the reactivity of methylxanthines.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Progress in Methylxanthine Biosynthesis: Insights into Pathways and Engineering Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Analysis of Conformational Preferences in Caffeine.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The methylxanthines have attracted interest due to the changes on their biological activities and physicochemical properties in terms of the number and position of the methyl groups present in the xanthine moiety. We report a theoretical study of the influence of the methyl substituent in the basicity and reactivity of xanthine and its methylated derivatives. Our results provide that when the xanthine increases the number of methyl substituents, the gas phase basicity increases (reactivity to proton increases), and the global hardness decreases. The result is in agreement with the maximum hardness principle (MHP) that states, "at equilibrium, chemical systems are as hard as possible" (Pearson, R.G., J. Chem. Educ., 1987, 64, 561-567, and Parr R.G., Chattaraj P.K., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 1854-1855). Graphical abstract Xanthine and its methyl derivatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30392139What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.