Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30392125›Full record

ArticleHealth & justice2018

Protocol for a randomized controlled trial of the Breaking Free Online Health and Justice program for substance misuse in prison settings.

Sarah Elison-Davies, Glyn Davies, Jonathan Ward, Stephanie Dugdale, Samantha Weston, Andrew Jones, Michelle Brides, John Weekes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health & justice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventions for female drug-using offenders.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarah Elison-DaviesBreaking Free Group, Manchester Science Park, Manchester, M15 6LR, UK. selison@breakingfreegroup.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5649-640X
Glyn DaviesBreaking Free Group, Manchester Science Park, Manchester, M15 6LR, UK.
Jonathan WardBreaking Free Group, Manchester Science Park, Manchester, M15 6LR, UK.
Stephanie DugdaleBreaking Free Group, Manchester Science Park, Manchester, M15 6LR, UK.
Samantha WestonUniversity of Keele, School of Social Science and Public Policy, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.
Andrew JonesUniversity of Manchester, Centre for Epidemiology, Manchester, M13 6PL, UK.
Michelle BridesSpectrum Community Health, HMP Preston, 2 Ribbleton Lane, Preston, PR1 5AB, UK.
John WeekesWaypoint Centre for Mental Health Care, Penetanguishene, ON, L9M 1G3, Canada.
University of Manchester · GBKeele University · GBPreston's College · GBWaypoint Centre for Mental Health Care · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSubstance misuse, including problematic drug and alcohol use, are significant issues in society that can have multiple detrimental effects. Many people access support for their substance misuse during prison sentences, due to the associations between substance misuse and offending, and the high proportion of the prison population who have drug and alcohol issues. Breaking Free Online Health and Justice is a computer-assisted therapy program that has been developed to support substance-involved offenders to address their substance misuse and associated offending within prison settings.

methodsThis will be a parallel-group randomized controlled trial of 4-week Breaking Free Online Health and Justice program as an adjunct to standard treatment for substance misuse, in comparison to standard treatment only, in a male Category D open prison. Interventional and control groups will be compared in terms of the changes in their scores on multiple measures from baseline to post-treatment assessment at 4-weeks, and then 3- and 6-months follow-up. Participants will be adult male offenders serving sentences in prison in England who have demonstrable difficulties with drugs and/or alcohol for at least the past 12-months. The primary outcome measure will be self-reported substance misuse, with secondary outcomes being standardized psychometric assessments of substance dependence, mental health, biopsychosocial functioning, quality of life and post-release offending. Other secondary measures will include frequency of completion of specific intervention strategies in the program. DISCUSSION: This study will examine whether Breaking Free Online Health and Justice as an adjunct to standard substance misuse interventions in prisons, improves outcomes for substance-involved offenders receiving interventions in custodial settings. Findings from the study will be used to inform further developments of the program and potential improvements to custodial treatment. TRIALS REGISTRATION: ISRCTN09846981 .

Indexed as

AlcoholComputer-assisted therapyCriminal justiceDrugsPrisonsRecoverySubstance misuse

Identifiers

PMID30392125
PMCPMC6755620
OpenAlexW2898623273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.