ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2018
Repeatability of dynamic contrast enhanced v
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review on the use of quantitative imaging to detect cancer therapy adverse effects in normal-appearing brain tissue.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2022Pooled it
- DCE-MRI quantitative analysis and MRI-based radiomics for predicting the early efficacy of microwave ablation in lung cancers.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025Article
- Mathematical modelling of the dynamics of image-informed tumor habitats in a murine model of glioma.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- High-Grade Glioma Treatment Response Monitoring Biomarkers: A Position Statement on the Evidence Supporting the Use of Advanced MRI Techniques in the Clinic, and the Latest Bench-to-Bedside Developments. Part 1: Perfusion and Diffusion Techniques.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- DCE-MRI in Glioma, Infiltration Zone and Healthy Brain to Assess Angiogenesis: A Biopsy Study.Clinical neuroradiology · 2021Article
- Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging towards clinical application in multiple sclerosis.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2021Review
- Review
- Repeatability of tumor perfusion kinetics from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in glioblastoma.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo study the repeatability of plasma volume (v
methodsTwenty eight healthy subjects, of which eleven scanned twice, were used to assess the repeatability of v
resultsThe threshold values for significant changes were: LDD = 0.0024 (ml/100 ml, 21%) for mean v
conclusionThis study shows high repeatability of v
Indexed as
Identifiers
30392091What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.