Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30391859›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2018

A dual modeling approach to automatic segmentation of cerebral T2 hyperintensities and T1 black holes in multiple sclerosis.

Alessandra M Valcarcel, Kristin A Linn, Fariha Khalid, Simon N Vandekar, Shahamat Tauhid, Theodore D Satterthwaite, John Muschelli, Melissa Lynne Martin, Rohit Bakshi, Russell T Shinohara

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mapping the relationship of white matter lesions to depression in multiple sclerosis.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alessandra M ValcarcelDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: alval@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Kristin A LinnDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Fariha KhalidLaboratory for Neuroimaging Research, Partners Multiple Sclerosis Center, Ann Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases, Boston, MA, USA; Departments of Neurology and Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Simon N VandekarDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Shahamat TauhidLaboratory for Neuroimaging Research, Partners Multiple Sclerosis Center, Ann Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases, Boston, MA, USA; Departments of Neurology and Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Theodore D SatterthwaiteDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
John MuschelliDepartment of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Melissa Lynne MartinDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Rohit BakshiLaboratory for Neuroimaging Research, Partners Multiple Sclerosis Center, Ann Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases, Boston, MA, USA; Departments of Neurology and Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Russell T ShinoharaDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
University of Pennsylvania · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Statistical Methods for Multilevel Multivariate Functional StudiesR01NS060910 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Ciprian M Crainiceanu · 2009 to 2026
$8.3M
Inter-modal Coupling Image AnalyticsR01MH112847 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Theodore Satterthwaite, Russell Takeshi Shinohara · 2017 to 2026
$5.9M
Statistical methods for large and complex databases of ultra-high-dimensionalR01NS085211 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SHINOHARA, RUSSELL TAKESHI · 2013 to 2017
$1.8M
Spatiotemporal Modeling of MRI Brain Lesion Trajectories of Biomarker DiscoveryR21NS093349 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ELOYAN, ANI, SHINOHARA, RUSSELL TAKESHI · 2016 to 2017
$454k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112847NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS060910NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS085211NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS093349
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is crucial for in vivo detection and characterization of white matter lesions (WML) in multiple sclerosis (MS). The most widely established MRI outcome measure is the volume of hyperintense lesions on T2-weighted images (T2L). Unfortunately, T2L are non-specific for the level of tissue destruction and show a weak relationship to clinical status. Interest in lesions that appear hypointense on T1-weighted images (T1L) ("black holes") has grown because T1L provide more specificity for axonal loss and a closer link to neurologic disability. The technical difficulty of T1L segmentation has led investigators to rely on time-consuming manual assessments prone to inter- and intra-rater variability. This study aims to develop an automatic T1L segmentation approach, adapted from a T2L segmentation algorithm. MATERIALS AND

methodsT1, T2, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences were acquired from 40 MS subjects at 3 Tesla (3 T). T2L and T1L were manually segmented. A Method for Inter-Modal Segmentation Analysis (MIMoSA) was then employed.

resultsUsing cross-validation, MIMoSA proved to be robust for segmenting both T2L and T1L. For T2L, a Sørensen-Dice coefficient (DSC) of 0.66 and partial AUC (pAUC) up to 1% false positive rate of 0.70 were achieved. For T1L, 0.53 DSC and 0.64 pAUC were achieved. Manual and MIMoSA segmented volumes were correlated and resulted in 0.88 for T1L and 0.95 for T2L. The correlation between Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores and manual versus automatic volumes were similar for T1L (0.32 manual vs. 0.34 MIMoSA), T2L (0.33 vs. 0.32), and the T1L/T2L ratio (0.33 vs 0.33).

conclusionsThough originally designed to segment T2L, MIMoSA performs well for segmenting T1 black holes in patients with MS.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedAdultAlgorithmsBrainFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMultiple SclerosisSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID30391859
PMCPMC6224321
OpenAlexW2895883059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.