Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30391756›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2018

Modality-independent recruitment of inferior frontal cortex during speech processing in human infants.

Nicole Altvater-Mackensen, Tobias Grossmann

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The other-race effect on the McGurk effect in infancy.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicole Altvater-MackensenDepartment of Psychology, Johannes-Gutenberg-University Mainz, Germany; Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany. Electronic address: altvater@uni-mainz.de.
Tobias GrossmannDepartment of Psychology, University of Virginia, USA; Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences · DEUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite increasing interest in the development of audiovisual speech perception in infancy, the underlying mechanisms and neural processes are still only poorly understood. In addition to regions in temporal cortex associated with speech processing and multimodal integration, such as superior temporal sulcus, left inferior frontal cortex (IFC) has been suggested to be critically involved in mapping information from different modalities during speech perception. To further illuminate the role of IFC during infant language learning and speech perception, the current study examined the processing of auditory, visual and audiovisual speech in 6-month-old infants using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). Our results revealed that infants recruit speech-sensitive regions in frontal cortex including IFC regardless of whether they processed unimodal or multimodal speech. We argue that IFC may play an important role in associating multimodal speech information during the early steps of language learning.

Indexed as

FemaleFrontal LobeHumansInfantMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleSpeechSpeech PerceptionfNIRSInfant speech perceptionInferior frontal cortexModality differences

Identifiers

PMID30391756
PMCPMC6969291
OpenAlexW2898773512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.