Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30390688›Full record

ArticleJournal of ovarian research2018

Diagnostic value of the gynecology imaging reporting and data system (GI-RADS) with the ovarian malignancy marker CA-125 in preoperative adnexal tumor assessment.

Michal Migda, Migda Bartosz, Marian S Migda, Marcin Kierszk, Gieryn Katarzyna, Marek Maleńczyk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ovarian research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE Consensus Statement on pre-operative diagnosis of ovarian tumors.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Michal MigdaClinical Unit of Obstetrics, Women's Disease and Gynecological Oncology, sw. Jozefa 53/59, United District Hospital, Collegium Medicum University of Nicolaus Copernicus in Toruń, Torun, Poland. mchmigda@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3514-3282
Migda BartoszDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Second Faculty of Medicine with the English Division and the Physiotherapy Division, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Marian S MigdaCivis Vita Medical Center, Torun, Poland.
Marcin KierszkClinical Unit of Obstetrics, Women's Disease and Gynecological Oncology, sw. Jozefa 53/59, United District Hospital, Collegium Medicum University of Nicolaus Copernicus in Toruń, Torun, Poland.
Gieryn KatarzynaClinical Unit of Obstetrics, Women's Disease and Gynecological Oncology, sw. Jozefa 53/59, United District Hospital, Collegium Medicum University of Nicolaus Copernicus in Toruń, Torun, Poland.
Marek MaleńczykClinical Unit of Obstetrics, Women's Disease and Gynecological Oncology, sw. Jozefa 53/59, United District Hospital, Collegium Medicum University of Nicolaus Copernicus in Toruń, Torun, Poland.
Nicolaus Copernicus University · PLMedical University of Warsaw · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe purpose of this study is to assess the preoperative evaluation of an adnexal mass using the GI-RADS classification and to verify whether CA-125 measurement can offer any additional benefits to the GI-RADS-based prediction of ovarian tumor malignancy. MATERIAL AND

methodsIn this study, we assessed a total of 215 women with an adnexal tumor using the GI-RADS classification combined with CA-125 measurement. All adnexal masses underwent histological verification.

resultsOf a total of 215 lesions, we classified 2 lesions as GI-RADS 2 (0.9%), 118 lesions as GI-RADS 3 (54.9%), 86 lesions as GI-RADS 4 (40.0%) and 9 lesions as GI-RADS 5 (4.2%). For GI-RADS 4-5 lesions, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, ACC and OR were as follows: 94.3, 72.2, 52.6, 97.5, 77.7%, and 43.3 (CI 12.0-146), respectively. The corresponding parameters resulting from combining the GI-RADS classification with the CA-125 marker were as follows: 66.0, 93.8, 77.8, 89.4, 87.0%, and 29.6 (CI 12.6-69.6), respectively, with p < 0.001. For Ca-125 > 30 IU/mL alone, the results were as follows: 70.0, 80.3, 53.8, 89.1, 77.7%, and 9.5 (4.6-19.6), respectively, with p < 0.0001. Additionally, 47.8% of the patients had no symptoms, 36.5% had back pain, 5.2% had an increased abdominal size, 4.3% had menstrual irregularities and 2.6% had constipation. There were 152 benign and 18 malignant cases in the low risk group (GIRADS 1-3 and GIRADS 4 + CA-125 < 30 IU/mL) and 10 benign and 35 malignant tumors in the high-risk group (GIRADS 4 + CA125 > 30 IU/mL and GIRADS 5).

conclusionsGI-RADS classification had good performance in discriminating ovarian tumors. The additional measurement of CA-125 improves the system specificity, PPV and ACC for preoperative adnexal tumor assessment.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCA-125 AntigenFemaleHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalMiddle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsUltrasonographyYoung AdultBiomarkers, TumorCA-125 AntigenCa-125Gynecology imaging reporting and data systemOvarian tumorUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID30390688
PMCPMC6215357
OpenAlexW2899195350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.