Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30390625›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2018

Defining conditions for biofilm inhibition and eradication assays for Gram-positive clinical reference strains.

Cristina D Cruz, Shreya Shah, Päivi Tammela

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 170 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The KW18 peptide acts as a dual antimicrobial and immunomodulatory therapeutic candidate in the context of antimicrobial resistance.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Impact of Biofilm Formation by VaginalJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  20. Control ofFuture microbiology · 2025
    Article

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cristina D CruzDrug Research Program, Division of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 56, Helsinki, Finland.
Shreya ShahDrug Research Program, Division of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 56, Helsinki, Finland.
Päivi TammelaDrug Research Program, Division of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 56, Helsinki, Finland. paivi.tammela@helsinki.fi.ORCID 0000-0003-4697-8066
University of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiofilms are formed by a complex bacterial community encapsulated by a polymeric matrix, with strong adherent properties and persistent phenotype. Biofilms are considered one of the most challenging areas of modern medicine. Existing antibiotics have been developed against free-floating bacterial cells, and thus, many treatments of biofilm-related infection fail. In this study, we compared the effects of different media on biofilm growth of clinical reference strains of Staphylococci and Enterococci, including multi-drug resistant representatives. Further, we optimized the resazurin-based assay for determining the minimal biofilm inhibitory concentration (MBIC) of standard antibiotics, and evaluated its use for the determination of minimal biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC).

resultsWe showed that tryptic soy broth supplemented with 1% glucose was an optimal media for maximum biofilm growth of all strains tested, with an extended incubation time for Enterococci. A range of parameters were tested for the resazurin assay, including concentration, temperature and time of incubation. Using quality parameters to analyze the assay's performance, the conditions for the resazurin assay were set as follows: 4 μg/mL and 8 μg/mL, with incubation at 25 °C for 20 min and 40 min for Staphylococci and Enterococci, respectively.

conclusionsIn summary, we defined conditions for optimal biofilm growth and for standardized resazurin assay for MBIC determination against six Gram-positive clinical reference strains. We also observed that MBEC determination by the resazurin-based assay is limited due to the poor detection limit of the assay. Complementary cell counting data is needed for precise determination of MBEC.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsCaseinsCulture MediaEnterococcusGlucoseGram-Positive BacteriaGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsLimit of DetectionMicrobial Sensitivity TestsOxazinesProtein HydrolysatesReference StandardsStaphylococcusXanthenesAnti-Bacterial AgentsCaseinsCulture MediaGlucoseOxazinesProtein Hydrolysatesresazurintrypticase-soy brothXanthenesBiofilmCiprofloxacinCrystal violetGlucoseGram-positive bacteriaLinezolidMBECMBICMediaResazurin

Identifiers

PMID30390625
PMCPMC6215609
OpenAlexW2899214427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.