ArticleJournal of molecular histology2019
Discrimination of normal oral mucosa from oral cancer by mass spectrometry imaging of proteins and lipids.
Article in Journal of molecular histology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- MALDI Tandem Mass Spectrometry for Colony-Based Dereplication of Natural Products.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Review
- Integrating MALDI-MSI-Based Spatial Proteomics and Machine Learning to Predict Chemoradiotherapy Outcomes in Head and Neck Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Seeing is Believing: Developing Multimodal Metabolic Insights at the Molecular Level.ACS central science · 2024Review
- Quantitative mass spectrometry imaging: therapeutics & biomolecules.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2024Review
- Prognostic Value of Molecular Intratumor Heterogeneity in Primary Oral Cancer and Its Lymph Node Metastases Assessed by Mass Spectrometry Imaging.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Tumor Tissue Oxidative Stress Changes and Na, K-ATPase Evaluation in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.The Journal of membrane biology · 2021Article
- Intra-Tumor Heterogeneity Revealed by Mass Spectrometry Imaging Is Associated with the Prognosis of Breast Cancer.Cancers · 2021Article
- Applications of Lipidomics in Tumor Diagnosis and Therapy.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021Article
- Article
- A Study of the Lipidomic Profiles of the CAL-27 and HOK Cell Lines Using EMS Spectra.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Considerations for MALDI-Based Quantitative Mass Spectrometry Imaging Studies.Journal of proteome research · 2020Article
- Classification of Thyroid Tumors Based on Mass Spectrometry Imaging of Tissue Microarrays; a Single-Pixel Approach.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Oral cancer diagnosis and perspectives in India.Sensors international · 2020Review
- Lipids and cancer: Emerging roles in pathogenesis, diagnosis and therapeutic intervention.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2020Review
- Artificial Intelligence to Decode Cancer Mechanism: Beyond Patient Stratification for Precision Oncology.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Review
- Molecular Heterogeneity of Papillary Thyroid Cancer: Comparison of Primary Tumors and Synchronous Metastases in Regional Lymph Nodes by Mass Spectrometry Imaging.Endocrine pathology · 2019Article
- Mass spectrometry imaging to detect lipid biomarkers and disease signatures in cancer.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2019Review
- Use of mTRAQ derivatization reagents on tissues for imaging neurotransmitters by MALDI imaging mass spectrometry: the triple spray method.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2019Article
- Nanomedicines for Near-Infrared Fluorescent Lifetime-Based Bioimaging.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Identification of biomarkers for molecular classification of cancer and for differentiation between cancerous and normal epithelium remains a vital issue in the field of head and neck cancer. Here we aimed to compare the ability of proteome and lipidome components to discriminate oral cancer from normal mucosa. Tissue specimens including squamous cell cancer and normal epithelium were analyzed by MALDI mass spectrometry imaging. Two molecular domains of tissue components were imaged in serial sections-peptides (resulting from trypsin-processed proteins) and lipids (primarily zwitterionic phospholipids), then regions of interest corresponding to cancer and normal epithelium were compared. Heterogeneity of cancer regions was higher than the heterogeneity of normal epithelium, and the distribution of peptide components was more heterogeneous than the distribution of lipid components. Moreover, there were more peptide components than lipid components that showed significantly different abundance between cancer and normal epithelium (median of the Cohen's effect was 0.49 and 0.31 in case of peptide and lipid components, respectively). Multicomponent cancer classifier was tested (vs. normal epithelium) using tissue specimens from three patients and then validated with a tissue specimen from the fourth patient. Peptide-based signature and lipid-based signature allowed cancer classification with a weighted accuracy of 0.85 and 0.69, respectively. Nevertheless, both classifiers had very high precision (0.98 and 0.94, respectively). We concluded that though molecular differences between cancerous and normal mucosa were higher in the proteome domain than in the analyzed lipidome subdomain, imaging of lipidome components also enabled discrimination of oral cancer and normal epithelium. Therefore, both cancer proteome and lipidome are promising sources of biomarkers of oral malignancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.