ArticleHeart and vessels2019
A novel protocol for initial heparin administration during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients taking direct oral anticoagulants.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Appropriate intraprocedural initial heparin dosing in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation receiving uninterrupted non-vitamin-K antagonist oral anticoagulant treatment.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2021Trial
- Individualized dose-response algorithm vs weight-based heparin dosing for intraprocedural anticoagulation during atrial fibrillation ablation.Heart rhythm O2 · 2026Article
- Intraprocedural activated clotting time and heparin dosage in pulsed field ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Evaluation of an adaptive, rule-based dosing algorithm to maintain therapeutic anticoagulation during atrial fibrillation ablation.Cardiovascular digital health journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thromboembolism and bleeding complications remain a major limitation of the catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to evaluate the association between achieving target activated clotting time (ACT) and clinical factors, and to develop an appropriate protocol for early achievement of target ACT in patients with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). At the initiation cohort, 190 patients (127 males, age 68 ± 9) taking DOACs who underwent CA for AF were studied. All patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography/transesophageal echocardiography/blood sampling before the CA. The ACTs were measured before heparin administration (pre-ACT) and in 30 min (30-min ACT) after initial heparin administration (100 U/kg +3000 U). At the validation cohort, the indicator obtained from the first study was reassessed in the subsequent 138 patients (94 males, age 68 ± 10). At the initiation cohort, 30-min ACT reached the target ACT in 79/190 patients (42%). Univariate analysis showed that longer pre-ACT, elevated aPTT, higher PT-INR, antiplatelet medication, and dabigatran were associated with achieving the target 30-min ACT. On multivariate analysis, only longer pre-ACT was independently associated with achieving the target 30-min ACT (P = 0.0396, the optimal cutoff value; 130 s). As a novel protocol, we added 2000 U of initial heparin dose (total 100 U/kg +5000 U) in patients with low pre-ACT (< 130); then, the achievement rate to target 30-min ACT improved from 41.6 to 80.5% without increasing bleeding complications. Our novel protocol of initial heparin administration based on pre-ACT is useful for an appropriate systemic anticoagulation in patients taking DOACs during the CA for AF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30390125What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.