Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30390114›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2019

Chemoradiotherapy with and without deep regional hyperthermia for squamous cell carcinoma of the anus.

Oliver J Ott, Manfred Schmidt, Sabine Semrau, Vratislav Strnad, Klaus E Matzel, Ignaz Schneider, Dimitrios Raptis, Wolfgang Uter, Robert Grützmann, Rainer Fietkau

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02369939 (Randomized Trial to Evaluate Effects of Deep Regional Hyperthermia in Patients With Anal Carcinoma Treated by Standard Radiochemotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02369939 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

Randomized Trial to Evaluate Effects of Deep Regional Hyperthermia in Patients With Anal Carcinoma Treated by Standard Radiochemotherapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Erlangen-Nürnberg Medical SchoolRan2014 to 2021Enrolled118ConditionsAnal CarcinomaArmsIrradiation, Mitomycin C, 5-Fluorouracil, Hyperthermia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Impact of dose escalation on colostomy-free survival and treatment outcome in squamous cell anal carcinoma.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2023
    Article
  4. A patterns of care analysis of hyperthermia in combination with radio(chemo)therapy or chemotherapy in European clinical centers.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Should neoadjuvant chemoradiation be combined with regional hyperthermia for rectal cancer?]Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2021
    Article
  9. Improved treatment outcome and lower skin toxicity with intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs. 3D conventional radiotherapy in anal cancer.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2020
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Heating technology for malignant tumors: a review.International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group · 2020
    Review
  12. Chemoradiotherapy for anal cancer: are we as good as we think?Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2019
    Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Oliver J OttDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Universitätsstr. 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany. oliver.ott@uk-erlangen.de.
Manfred SchmidtDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Universitätsstr. 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Sabine SemrauDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Universitätsstr. 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Vratislav StrnadDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Universitätsstr. 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Klaus E MatzelDepartment of Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Ignaz SchneiderDepartment of Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Dimitrios RaptisDepartment of Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Wolfgang UterDepartment of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Robert GrützmannDepartment of Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Rainer FietkauDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Universitätsstr. 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Universitätsklinikum Erlangen · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare results after chemoradiotherapy with and without deep regional hyperthermia in patients with anal cancer.

methodsBetween 2000 and 2015, a total of 112 consecutive patients with UICC stage I-IV anal cancer received chemoradiotherapy with 5‑fluororuracil and mitomycin C (CRT). In case of insufficient tumor response 4-6 weeks after chemoradiotherapy, patients received an interstitial pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy boost. Additionally, 50/112 patients received hyperthermia treatments (HCRT).

resultsMedian follow-up was 41 (2-165) months. After 5 years follow-up, overall (95.8 vs. 74.5%, P = 0.045), disease-free (89.1 vs. 70.4%, P = 0.027), local recurrence-free (97.7 vs. 78.7%, P = 0.006), and colostomy-free survival rates (87.7 vs. 69.0%, P = 0.016) were better for the HCRT group. Disease-specific, regional failure-free, and distant metastasis-free survival rates showed no significant differences. The adjusted hazard ratios for death were 0.25 (95% CI, 0.07 to 0.92; P = 0.036) and for local recurrence 0.14 (95% CI, 0.02 to 1.09; P = 0.06), respectively. Grades 3-4 early toxicities were comparable with the exception of hematotoxicity, which was higher in the HCRT group (66 vs. 43%, P = 0.032). Incidences of late side effects were similar with the exception of a higher telangiectasia rate in the HCRT group (38.0 vs. 16.1%, P = 0.009).

conclusionAdditional regional hyperthermia improved overall survival, local control, and colostomy rates. Its potential beneficial role has to be confirmed in a prospective randomized setting. Therefore, the HyCAN trial has already been established by our group and is currently recruiting patients (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02369939).

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnus NeoplasmsBrachytherapyCarcinoma, Squamous CellColostomyCombined Modality TherapyDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFluorouracilFollow-Up StudiesHumansHyperthermia, InducedMaleFluorouracilMitomycinAnal cancerChemoradiationDeep regional hyperthermiaMultimodality treatmentRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID30390114
OpenAlexW2899514183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.