Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30390031›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of gastroenterology2018

Endoscopist Specialty Predicts the Likelihood of Recommending Cessation of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Older Adults.

Audrey H Calderwood, Joseph C Anderson, Christina M Robinson, Lynn F Butterly

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance Colonoscopy in Older Adults.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Audrey H CalderwoodSection of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA. The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA. Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, Hartford, VT, USA.
Joseph C AndersonSection of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA. The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA. Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, Hartford, VT, USA.
Christina M RobinsonSection of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA. The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA. Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, Hartford, VT, USA.
Lynn F ButterlySection of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA. The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA. Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, Hartford, VT, USA.
Dartmouth College · USDartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center · US

Funding

Comparing strategies for managing patients after poor colonoscopy bowel cleansingR03DK104000 · NIDDK · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI CALDERWOOD, AUDREY HONG · 2015 to 2016
$203k
NIDDK NIH HHS R03 DK104000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAlthough the 2008 US Preventive Services Task Force guidelines recommend against routine colorectal cancer (CRC) screening for adults aged 76-85, it is unclear what endoscopists recommend in practice. Our goal was to examine current practice around cessation of CRC screening in older adults.

methodsWe included normal screening colonoscopy exams in adults ≥ 50 years old within the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry between 2009 and 2014. The primary outcome was endoscopists' recommendation against further screening. The main exposure variables included patient age, family history of CRC, and endoscopist characteristics. Descriptive statistics and univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were used.

resultsOf 13,364 normal screening colonoscopy exams, 2914 (21.8%) were in adults aged ≥ 65 and were performed by 74 endoscopists. Nearly 100% of adults aged 65-69 undergoing screening colonoscopy were given the recommendation to return for screening colonoscopy in the future. Only 15% of average-risk patients aged 70-74 were told to stop receiving screening, while 85% were told to return at a future interval, most frequently in 10 years when they would be 80-84. In the multivariable model, advancing patient age and the absence of family history of CRC were significantly associated with a recommendation to stop colonoscopy. Gastroenterologists were more likely to recommend stopping colonoscopy in accordance with guidelines than other non-gastroenterology endoscopists (adjusted OR (95% CI) 2.3 (1.6-3.4)).

conclusionsIn a large statewide colonoscopy registry, the majority of older adults are told to return for future screening colonoscopy. Having a family history of CRC or a non-gastroenterology endoscopist increases the likelihood of being told to return for screening at advanced ages.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsChildColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleGastroenterologistsHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMass ScreeningMedical History TakingMedical OveruseMiddle AgedPhysicians, Family

Identifiers

PMID30390031
PMCPMC6768595
OpenAlexW2899471251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.