ArticleScientific reports2018
Mining latent information in PTSD psychometrics with fuzziness for effective diagnoses.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Contributing Factors of Delayed-Onset Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms: A Nested Case-Control Study Conducted After the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The options of traditional self-report rating-scale, like the PTSD Checklist Civilian (PCL-C) scale, have no clear boundaries which might cause considerable biases and low effectiveness. This research aimed to explore the feasibility of using fuzzy set in the data processing to promote the screening effectiveness of PCL-C in real-life practical settings. The sensitivity, specificity, Youden's index etc., of PCL-C at different cutoff lines (38, 44 and 50 respectively) were analyzed and compared with those of fuzzy set approach processing. In practice, no matter the cutoff line of the PCL-C was set at 50, 44 or 38, the PCL-C showed good specificity, but failed to exhibit good sensitivity and screening effectiveness. The highest sensitivity was at 65.22%, with Youden's index being 0.64. After fuzzy processing, the fuzzy-PCL-C's sensitivity increased to 91.30%, Youden's index rose to 0.91, having seen marked augmentation. In conclusion, this study indicates that fuzzy set can be used in the data processing of psychiatric scales which have no clear definition standard of the options to improve the effectiveness of the scales.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.