Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30389920›Full record

ArticleNature communications2018

Improved estimation of cancer dependencies from large-scale RNAi screens using model-based normalization and data integration.

James M McFarland, Zandra V Ho, Guillaume Kugener, Joshua M Dempster, Phillip G Montgomery, Jordan G Bryan, John M Krill-Burger, Thomas M Green, Francisca Vazquez, Jesse S Boehm and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 254 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
254citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

254 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. PHLPP is neither a Phosphatase nor a Tumor Suppressor.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. FTO depletion does not alter mbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

194 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

James M McFarlandBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, 02142, MA, USA.
Zandra V HoBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, 02142, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4046-0266
Guillaume KugenerBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, 02142, MA, USA.
Joshua M DempsterBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, 02142, MA, USA.
Phillip G MontgomeryBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, 02142, MA, USA.
Jordan G BryanBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, 02142, MA, USA.
John M Krill-BurgerBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, 02142, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9614-4671
Thomas M GreenBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, 02142, MA, USA.
Francisca VazquezBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, 02142, MA, USA.
Jesse S BoehmBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, 02142, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6795-6336
Todd R GolubBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, 02142, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0113-2403
William C HahnBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, 02142, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2840-9791
David E RootBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, 02142, MA, USA.
Aviad TsherniakBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, 02142, MA, USA. aviad@broadinstitute.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3797-1877

Funding

The Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Cancer Target Discovery and Development CenterU01CA176058 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI HAHN, WILLIAM C. · 2013 to 2021
$7.8M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA176058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The availability of multiple datasets comprising genome-scale RNAi viability screens in hundreds of diverse cancer cell lines presents new opportunities for understanding cancer vulnerabilities. Integrated analyses of these data to assess differential dependency across genes and cell lines are challenging due to confounding factors such as batch effects and variable screen quality, as well as difficulty assessing gene dependency on an absolute scale. To address these issues, we incorporated cell line screen-quality parameters and hierarchical Bayesian inference into DEMETER2, an analytical framework for analyzing RNAi screens ( https://depmap.org/R2-D2 ). This model substantially improves estimates of gene dependency across a range of performance measures, including identification of gold-standard essential genes and agreement with CRISPR/Cas9-based viability screens. It also allows us to integrate information across three large RNAi screening datasets, providing a unified resource representing the most extensive compilation of cancer cell line genetic dependencies to date.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingModels, GeneticRNA InterferenceGenes, EssentialHumansNeoplasmsSoftware

Identifiers

PMID30389920
PMCPMC6214982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.