Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30389760›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2018

Trial of intraoperative cell salvage versus transfusion in ovarian cancer (TIC TOC): protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study.

Khadra Galaal, Alberto Lopes, Colin Pritchard, Andrew Barton, Jennifer Wingham, Elsa M R Marques, John Faulds, Joanne Palmer, Patricia Jane Vickery, Catherine Ralph and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Safety of Intraoperative Cell Salvage in Cancer Surgery: An Updated Meta-Analysis of the Current Literature.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Khadra GalaalGynaeoncology, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, UK.
Alberto LopesMedical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Colin PritchardResearch, Development and Innovation, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, UK.
Andrew BartonNIHR research and Design Services (South West), NIHR South West Research Design Service, Plymouth, UK.
Jennifer WinghamGynaecology, Royal Cornwall Hospital NHS Trust, Truro, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3342-1202
Elsa M R MarquesBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1360-5677
John FauldsRoyal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, UK.
Joanne PalmerResearch, Development and Innovation, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, UK.
Patricia Jane VickeryPeninsula Clinical Trials Unit, Plymouth University, Plymouth, UK.
Catherine RalphDepartment of Anaesthesia, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, UK.
Nicole FerreiraRoyal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, UK.
Paul EwingsNIHR research and Design Services (South West), NIHR South West Research Design Service, Plymouth, UK.
Royal Cornwall Hospital Trust · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Exeter · GBUniversity of Plymouth · GB

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-1014-35005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOvarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynaecological cancer, with more than 7000 new cases registered in the UK in 2014. In patients suitable for surgery, the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence guidance for treatment recommends surgical resection of all macroscopic tumour, followed by chemotherapy. The surgical procedure can be extensive and associated with substantial blood loss which is conventionally replaced with a donor blood transfusion. While often necessary and lifesaving, the use of donor blood is associated with increased risks of complications and adverse surgical outcomes. Intraoperative cell salvage (ICS) is a blood conservation strategy in which red cells collected from blood lost during surgery are returned to the patient thus minimising the use of donor blood. This is the protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial with an embedded qualitative study and feasibility economic evaluation. If feasible, a later definitive trial will test the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ICS reinfusion versus donor blood transfusion in ovarian cancer surgery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Sixty adult women scheduled for primary or interval ovarian cancer surgery at participating UK National Health Service Trusts will be recruited and individually randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive ICS reinfusion or donor blood (as required) during surgery. Participants will be followed up by telephone at 30 days postoperatively for adverse events monitoring and by postal questionnaire at 6 weeks and 3 monthly thereafter, to capture quality of life and resource use data. Qualitative interviews will capture participants' and clinicians' experiences of the study. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been granted ethical approval by the South West-Exeter Research Ethics Committee (ref: 16/SW/0256). Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and will inform the design of a larger trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN19517317.

Indexed as

Cytoreduction Surgical ProceduresOvariectomyBlood Loss, SurgicalBlood TransfusionBlood Transfusion, AutologousCost-Benefit AnalysisFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansOperative Blood SalvageOvarian NeoplasmsQualitative ResearchQuality of LifeTransplantation, Homologouscytoreductive surgerydonor blood transfusionfeasibility trialintraoperative cell salvageovarian cancerquality of life

Identifiers

PMID30389760
PMCPMC6224724
OpenAlexW2898633037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.