Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30389753›Full record

ReviewThe Plant cell2018

Evolution and Structural Characteristics of Plant Voltage-Gated K

Timothy Jegla, Gregory Busey, Sarah M Assmann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Plant cell, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. All Organisms Can Be Anesthetized, but There's No Point?BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  4. Structure reveals a regulation mechanism of plant outward-rectifying KProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. GORK KNature communications · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. A broad survey of choanoflagellates revises the evolutionary history of the Shaker family of voltage-gated KProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Engineering a KNature plants · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Timothy JeglaDepartment of Biology and Huck Institute for the Life Sciences, Penn State University, 230 Life Sciences Building, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802 tjj3@psu.edu sma3@psu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8616-2390
Gregory BuseyDepartment of Biology, Penn State University, 225 Life Sciences Building, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802.ORCID 0000-0002-4589-682X
Sarah M AssmannDepartment of Biology, Penn State University, 354 North Frear, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802 tjj3@psu.edu sma3@psu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4541-1594

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant voltage-gated K

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenomicsPlant ProteinsPotassium Channels, Voltage-GatedPlant ProteinsPotassium Channels, Voltage-Gated

Identifiers

PMID30389753
PMCPMC6354262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.