Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30389505›Full record

ArticleEBioMedicine2018

The Landscape and Implications of Chimeric RNAs in Cervical Cancer.

Peng Wu, Shuo Yang, Sandeep Singh, Fujun Qin, Shailesh Kumar, Ling Wang, Ding Ma, Hui Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EBioMedicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Science advances · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. OncogenicMedComm · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Peng WuThe Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis of the Ministry of Education of China, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China; Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.
Shuo YangThe Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis of the Ministry of Education of China, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.
Sandeep SinghDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.
Fujun QinDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.
Shailesh KumarDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA; National Institute of Plant Genome Research (NIPGR), New Delhi 110067, India.
Ling WangThe Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis of the Ministry of Education of China, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.
Ding MaThe Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis of the Ministry of Education of China, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China. Electronic address: dma@tjh.tjmu.edu.cn.
Hui LiDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA; School of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China. Electronic address: hl9r@virginia.edu.
Tongji Hospital · CNUniversity of Virginia · USNational Institute of Plant Genome Research · INTongji University · CNZhengzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGene fusions and fusion products have been proven to be ideal biomarkers and drug targets for cancer. Even though a comprehensive study of cervical cancer has been conducted as part of the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project, few recurrent gene fusions have been found, and none above 3% of frequency.

methodsWe believe that chimeric fusion RNAs generated by intergenic splicing represent a new repertoire of biomarkers and/or therapeutic targets. However, they would be missed when only genome sequences and fusions at DNA level are considered. We performed extensive data mining for chimeric RNAs using both our and TCGA cervical cancer RNA-Seq datasets. Multiple criteria were applied. We analyzed the landscape of chimeric RNAs at various levels, and from different angles.

findingsThe chimeric RNA landscape changed as different filters were applied. 15 highly frequent (>10%) chimeric RNAs were identified. LHX6-NDUFA8 was detected exclusively in cervical cancer tissues and Pap smears, but not in normal controls. Mechanistically, it is not due to interstitial deletion, but a product of cis-splicing between adjacent genes. Silencing of another recurrent chimera, SLC2A11-MIF, resulted in cell cycle arrest and reduced cellular proliferation. This effect is unique to the chimera, and not shared by the two parental genes.

interpretationHighly frequent chimeric RNAs are present in cervical cancers. They can be formed by intergenic splicing. Some have clear implications as potential biomarkers, or for shedding new light on the biology of the disease. FUND: Stand Up To Cancer and the National Science Foundation of China.

Indexed as

Oncogene Proteins, FusionRNA, NeoplasmUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCell Cycle CheckpointsFemaleHeLa CellsHumansOncogene Proteins, FusionRNA, NeoplasmBioinformaticsCervical cancerChimeric RNAGene fusionRNA-Seq

Identifiers

PMID30389505
PMCPMC6286271
OpenAlexW2898811622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.