Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30389065›Full record

ArticleApplied nursing research : ANR2018

Utilizing Internet-based recruitment and data collection to access different age groups of former family caregivers.

Kristin L Corey, Mary K McCurry, Kristen A Sethares, Meg Bourbonniere, Karen B Hirschman, Salimah H Meghani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied nursing research : ANR, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kristin L CoreyNewCourtland Center for Transitions and Health, University of Pennsylvania, School of Nursing, 418 Curie Blvd., Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States. Electronic address: coreykl@nursing.upenn.edu.
Mary K McCurryUniversity of Massachusetts Dartmouth, Department of Adult Nursing, 285 Old Westport Rd, North Dartmouth, MA 02747, United States.
Kristen A SetharesUniversity of Massachusetts Dartmouth, Department of Adult Nursing, 285 Old Westport Rd, North Dartmouth, MA 02747, United States.
Meg BourbonniereUniversity of Rhode Island, College of Nursing, 39 Butterfield Road, Kingston, RI 02881, United States.
Karen B HirschmanNewCourtland Center for Transitions and Health, University of Pennsylvania, School of Nursing, 418 Curie Blvd., Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.
Salimah H MeghaniNewCourtland Center for Transitions and Health, University of Pennsylvania, School of Nursing, 418 Curie Blvd., Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.

Funding

Individualized Care for At Risk Older AdultsT32NR009356 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Lauren M Massimo, MARY D NAYLOR · 2007 to 2026
$7.8M
NINR NIH HHS T32 NR009356
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As Internet accessibility grows among adults in the United States, researchers' utilization of Internet-based surveys and recruitment strategies has increased, but there is a paucity of knowledge about their use in different age groups of former dementia caregivers. The purpose of this secondary analysis is to describe 1) the use of Internet-based recruitment in obtaining a sample inclusive of young and middle aged (age 18-64), young-old (age 65-74), and older-old (age 75 and older) former dementia caregivers and 2) the feasibility of collecting data using an online survey in young and middle aged, young-old, and older-old former dementia caregivers. Utilizing convenience sampling, a four-step recruitment strategy encompassing a combination of Internet-based and non-Internet-based recruitment strategies was employed. Participants (N = 171) completed an online survey. Older-old, young-old, and young and middle-aged participants comprised 9%, 30%, and 61% of the sample respectively. All age cohorts provided minimal missing data using an online survey, but older-old participants required 15 additional minutes to complete the survey than young-old participants. Both cohorts of older adults were directed to the survey less frequently through online referral sources than young and middle-aged participants, and no older-old participants were referred via Facebook. All three age cohorts consisted of mostly white women. Internet-based surveys and recruitment were feasible among the age groups but may present challenges for the older-old and minorities. Further research on Internet-based data collection and recruitment is indicated in minority and older-old caregivers, focusing on trust, educational and financial disparities, and technological proficiency as potential barriers.

Indexed as

FamilyInternetSocial MediaAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCaregiversData CollectionDementiaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesFamily caregivingInternet recruitmentOlder adultOnline surveySocial media

Identifiers

PMID30389065
PMCPMC6662184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.