Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30388967›Full record

ReviewNutrition research reviews2019

Child and adolescent nutrient intakes from current national dietary surveys of European populations.

Holly L Rippin, Jayne Hutchinson, Jo Jewell, Joao J Breda, Janet E Cade

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrition research reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Holly L Rippin1Nutritional Epidemiology Group (NEG),School of Food Science and Nutrition,University of Leeds,Leeds LS2 9JT,UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8879-3978
Jayne Hutchinson1Nutritional Epidemiology Group (NEG),School of Food Science and Nutrition,University of Leeds,Leeds LS2 9JT,UK.
Jo Jewell2Division of Noncommunicable Diseases and Promoting Health through the Life-Course,World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe,UN City,Marmorvej 51,21000 Copenhagen,Denmark.
Joao J Breda2Division of Noncommunicable Diseases and Promoting Health through the Life-Course,World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe,UN City,Marmorvej 51,21000 Copenhagen,Denmark.
Janet E Cade1Nutritional Epidemiology Group (NEG),School of Food Science and Nutrition,University of Leeds,Leeds LS2 9JT,UK.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The WHO encourages national diet survey (NDS) implementation to obtain relevant data to inform policies addressing all forms of malnutrition, which remains a pressing issue throughout Europe. This paper provides an up-to-date review on energy, macro- and selected micronutrient intakes in children across WHO Europe using the latest available NDS intakes. It assesses these against WHO recommended nutrient intakes (RNI) to highlight vulnerable groups and areas of concern. Dietary survey information was gathered by Internet searches, contacting survey authors and nutrition experts. Survey characteristics, energy and nutrient intakes were extracted and weighted means calculated and presented by region. Child energy and nutrient intakes were extracted from twenty-one NDS across a third (n 18) of the fifty-three WHO Europe countries. Of these, 38 % (n 6) reported intakes by socio-economic group, but by various indicators. Energy and macronutrients, where boys and older children had higher intakes, were more widely reported than micronutrients. Most countries met under half of the WHO RNI for nutrients reported in their NDS. Micronutrient attainment was higher than macronutrients, but worst in girls and older children. Only a third, mainly Western, WHO European member states provided published data on child nutrient intakes. Gaps in provision mean that dietary inadequacies may go unidentified, preventing evidence-based policy formation. WHO RNI attainment was poor, particularly in girls and older children. Inconsistent age groups, dietary methodologies, nutrient composition databases and under-reporting hinder inter-country comparisons. Future efforts should encourage countries to conduct NDS in a standardised format by age and sociodemographic variables.

Indexed as

Child HealthDietFeeding BehaviorNutritional RequirementsNutritional StatusDiet SurveysEnergy IntakeEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMalnutritionMicronutrientsPolicyMicronutrientsCEEC Central and Eastern European countriesChild nutritionEnergy intakes%E percentage energyMacronutrient intakesMicronutrient intakesNational diet surveysNCD non-communicable diseaseNDS national diet surveyRecommended nutrient intakesRNI recommended nutrient intakeTFA trans-fatty acidWHO European region

Identifiers

PMID30388967
PMCPMC6536833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.