Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30388742›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2018

Notch and Wnt Dysregulation and Its Relevance for Breast Cancer and Tumor Initiation.

Eike-Benjamin Braune, Anita Seshire, Urban Lendahl

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Medulloblastoma: novel insights into emerging therapeutic targets.Expert opinion on therapeutic targets · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Regulation of cancer stem cells in triple negative breast cancer.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eike-Benjamin BrauneDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, Karolinska Institute, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden. eike-benjamin.braune@ki.se.
Anita SeshireMerck KGaA, Biopharma, Global R&D, Translational Innovation Platform Oncology, Frankfurter Str. 250, D-64293 Darmstadt, Germany. anita.seshire@merckgroup.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0285-9372
Urban LendahlDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, Karolinska Institute, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden. Urban.Lendahl@ki.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths among women in the world. Treatment has been improved and, in combination with early detection, this has resulted in reduced mortality rates. Further improvement in therapy development is however warranted. This will be particularly important for certain sub-classes of breast cancer, such as triple-negative breast cancer, where currently no specific therapies are available. An important therapy development focus emerges from the notion that dysregulation of two major signaling pathways, Notch and Wnt signaling, are major drivers for breast cancer development. In this review, we discuss recent insights into the Notch and Wnt signaling pathways and into how they act synergistically both in normal development and cancer. We also discuss how dysregulation of the two pathways contributes to breast cancer and strategies to develop novel breast cancer therapies starting from a Notch and Wnt dysregulation perspective.

Indexed as

breast cancercancer stem cellNotch signalingtumor therapyWnt signaling

Identifiers

PMID30388742
PMCPMC6315509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.