Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30388264›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2018

Loss of Enzymes in the Bile Acid Synthesis Pathway Explains Differences in Bile Composition among Mammals.

Virag Sharma, Michael Hiller

Abstract readComparative StudyLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Genetic Associations ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The nutritional requirements ofGenes & nutrition · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Virag SharmaMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany.
Michael HillerMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bile acids are important for absorbing nutrients. Most mammals produce cholic and chenodeoxycholic bile acids. Here, we investigated genes in the bile acid synthesis pathway in four mammals that deviate from the usual mammalian bile composition. First, we show that naked-mole rats, elephants, and manatees repeatedly inactivated CYP8B1, an enzyme uniquely required for cholic acid synthesis, which explains the absence of cholic acid in these species. Second, no gene-inactivating mutations were found in any pathway gene in the rhinoceros, a species that lacks bile acids, indicating an evolutionarily recent change in its bile composition. Third, elephants and/or manatees that also lack bile acids altogether have lost additional nonessential enzymes (SLC27A5, ACOX2). Apart from uncovering genomic differences explaining deviations in bile composition, our analysis of bile acid enzymes in bile acid-lacking species suggests that essentiality prevents gene loss, while loss of pleiotropic genes is permitted if their other functions are compensated by functionally related proteins.

Indexed as

AnimalsBileCholic AcidsMammalsSteroid 12-alpha-HydroxylaseCholic AcidsSteroid 12-alpha-Hydroxylase

Identifiers

PMID30388264
PMCPMC6296402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.