Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30388261›Full record

ReviewEuropean heart journal2019

Non-invasive imaging of the coronary arteries.

Philip D Adamson, David E Newby

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European heart journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Accuracy of analytically determined fractional flow reserve derived from coronary angiography for non-invasive assessment of coronary artery stenosis.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Diagnostics of atherosclerosis: Overview of the existing methods.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A case of the crossed coronaries.BJR case reports · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Philip D AdamsonBHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Room SU 305, Chancellor's Building, 49 Little France Cres, Edinburgh, UK.
David E NewbyBHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Room SU 305, Chancellor's Building, 49 Little France Cres, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

British Heart Foundation CH/09/002British Heart Foundation CH/09/002/26360British Heart Foundation RE/13/3/30183British Heart Foundation RG/16/10/32375Wellcome Trust WT103782AIA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-invasive imaging of the coronary arteries is an enterprise in rapid development. From the research perspective, there is great demand for in vivo techniques that can reliably identify features of high-risk plaque that may offer insight into pathophysiological processes and act as surrogate indicators of response to therapeutic intervention. Meanwhile, there is clear clinical need for greater accuracy in diagnosis and prognostic stratification. Fortunately, ongoing technological improvements and emerging data from randomized clinical trials are helping make these elusive goals a reality. This review provides an update on the current status of non-invasive coronary imaging with computed tomography, magnetic resonance, and positron emission tomography with a focus on current clinical applications and future research directions.

Indexed as

Computed Tomography AngiographyCoronary DiseaseCoronary StenosisCoronary VesselsHumansMagnetic Resonance AngiographyPlaque, AtheroscleroticPositron-Emission TomographyComputed tomographyCoronary heart diseaseMagnetic resonance imagingPositron emission tomography

Identifiers

PMID30388261
PMCPMC6669405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.