Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30388198›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2019

Bastion3: a two-layer ensemble predictor of type III secreted effectors.

Jiawei Wang, Jiahui Li, Bingjiao Yang, Ruopeng Xie, Tatiana T Marquez-Lago, André Leier, Morihiro Hayashida, Tatsuya Akutsu, Yanju Zhang, Kuo-Chen Chou and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The SPI-20 and SPI-21 T6SS gene clusters fromFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Use of Bastion for the Identification of Secreted Substrates.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  16. Protein Sorting Prediction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Microbial genomics · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jiawei WangInfection and Immunity Program, Biomedicine Discovery Institute and Department of Microbiology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Jiahui LiInfection and Immunity Program, Biomedicine Discovery Institute and Department of Microbiology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Bingjiao YangSchool of Computer Science and Information Security, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin, China.
Ruopeng XieSchool of Computer Science and Information Security, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin, China.
Tatiana T Marquez-LagoDepartment of Genetics, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL, USA.
André LeierDepartment of Genetics, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL, USA.
Morihiro HayashidaNational Institute of Technology, Matsue College, Matsue, Shimane, Japan.
Tatsuya AkutsuBioinformatics Center, Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Yanju ZhangSchool of Computer Science and Information Security, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin, China.
Kuo-Chen ChouGordon Life Science Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Joel SelkrigEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Genome Biology Unit, Heidelberg, Germany.
Tieli ZhouDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Jiangning SongInfection and Immunity Program, Biomedicine Discovery Institute and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Trevor LithgowInfection and Immunity Program, Biomedicine Discovery Institute and Department of Microbiology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

New Tricks for 'Old' Drugs: PK/PD of Polymyxin Nonantibiotic CombinationsR01AI111965 · NIAID · MONASH UNIVERSITY · PI LI, JIAN · 2014 to 2018
$4.3M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI111965
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationType III secreted effectors (T3SEs) can be injected into host cell cytoplasm via type III secretion systems (T3SSs) to modulate interactions between Gram-negative bacterial pathogens and their hosts. Due to their relevance in pathogen-host interactions, significant computational efforts have been put toward identification of T3SEs and these in turn have stimulated new T3SE discoveries. However, as T3SEs with new characteristics are discovered, these existing computational tools reveal important limitations: (i) most of the trained machine learning models are based on the N-terminus (or incorporating also the C-terminus) instead of the proteins' complete sequences, and (ii) the underlying models (trained with classic algorithms) employed only few features, most of which were extracted based on sequence-information alone. To achieve better T3SE prediction, we must identify more powerful, informative features and investigate how to effectively integrate these into a comprehensive model.

resultsIn this work, we present Bastion3, a two-layer ensemble predictor developed to accurately identify type III secreted effectors from protein sequence data. In contrast with existing methods that employ single models with few features, Bastion3 explores a wide range of features, from various types, trains single models based on these features and finally integrates these models through ensemble learning. We trained the models using a new gradient boosting machine, LightGBM and further boosted the models' performances through a novel genetic algorithm (GA) based two-step parameter optimization strategy. Our benchmark test demonstrates that Bastion3 achieves a much better performance compared to commonly used methods, with an ACC value of 0.959, F-value of 0.958, MCC value of 0.917 and AUC value of 0.956, which comprehensively outperformed all other toolkits by more than 5.6% in ACC value, 5.7% in F-value, 12.4% in MCC value and 5.8% in AUC value. Based on our proposed two-layer ensemble model, we further developed a user-friendly online toolkit, maximizing convenience for experimental scientists toward T3SE prediction. With its design to ease future discoveries of novel T3SEs and improved performance, Bastion3 is poised to become a widely used, state-of-the-art toolkit for T3SE prediction. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: http://bastion3.erc.monash.edu/. CONTACT: selkrig@embl.de or wyztli@163.com or or trevor.lithgow@monash.edu. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAlgorithmsAmino Acid SequenceBacterial ProteinsComputational BiologyGram-Negative BacteriaSoftwareBacterial Proteins

Identifiers

PMID30388198
PMCPMC7963071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.