Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30388176›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Evaluation of the Tobacco-Use Prevention Education (TUPE) program in California.

Sara B McMenamin, Sharon E Cummins, Yue-Lin Zhuang, Anthony C Gamst, Carlos G Ruiz, Antonio Mayoral, Shu-Hong Zhu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. School Staff Perspectives on Tobacco Prevention: Findings From a Statewide Educator Survey.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sara B McMenaminDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Sharon E CumminsDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3481-8436
Yue-Lin ZhuangMoores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Anthony C GamstDepartment of Mathematics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Carlos G RuizMoores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Antonio MayoralMoores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Shu-Hong ZhuDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4149-3441
University of California San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsThe California Tobacco-Use Prevention Education (TUPE) program promotes the use of evidence-based tobacco-specific prevention and cessation programs for adolescents within the school setting. Through a competitive grant process, schools are funded to provide programs for grades 6-12. This research evaluates the association between TUPE funding and tobacco prevention activities and tobacco use prevalence.

methodsThis study utilized two data sources: (1) 2016 California Educator Tobacco Survey (CETS), and (2) 2015-2016 California Student Tobacco Survey (CSTS). The CETS collected data from educators about school prevention efforts, priority of tobacco prevention, and confidence in addressing tobacco issues with students. A total of 3,564 educators from 590 schools participated in CETS. The CSTS collected data from 8th, 10th, and 12th graders in California on their exposure to, attitudes about, and utilization of tobacco products. A total of 47,981 students from 117 schools participated in CSTS.

resultsThis study found that TUPE-funded schools were more likely to provide tobacco-specific health education programs, to place a priority on tobacco-prevention efforts, and to prepare educators to address tobacco use than non-TUPE schools. Educators at both types of schools felt better prepared to talk with students about traditional tobacco products than about emerging products such as e-cigarettes. Overall, students at TUPE-funded schools were more likely to report receiving anti-tobacco messages from school-based programs than those at non-TUPE schools. The former were also less likely to use tobacco products, even when the analysis controlled for demographics and school-level characteristics (OR = 0.82 [95% CI = 0.70-0.96]).

conclusionsTUPE funding was associated with an increase in schools' tobacco-specific prevention activities and these enhanced activities were associated with lower tobacco use among students. This study also found that education and prevention efforts regarding emerging tobacco products need to be strengthened across all schools.

Indexed as

AdolescentAttitudeCaliforniaChildElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsFemaleHealth BehaviorHealth EducationHumansMaleSchoolsSmokingSmoking CessationSmoking PreventionStudentsTobacco Products

Identifiers

PMID30388176
PMCPMC6214574
OpenAlexW2899063505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.