Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30388172›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Factors influencing patient adherence with diabetic eye screening in rural communities: A qualitative study.

Yao Liu, Nicholas J Zupan, Olayinka O Shiyanbola, Rebecca Swearingen, Julia N Carlson, Nora A Jacobson, Jane E Mahoney, Ronald Klein, Timothy D Bjelland, Maureen A Smith

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Telemedicine for diabetic retinopathy screening.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yao LiuDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0700-0148
Nicholas J ZupanDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Olayinka O ShiyanbolaDepartment of Social and Administrative Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Pharmacy, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6018-2104
Rebecca SwearingenDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Julia N CarlsonDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Nora A JacobsonInstitute for Clinical and Translational Research, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Jane E MahoneyDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Ronald KleinDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Timothy D BjellandMile Bluff Medical Center, Mauston, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Maureen A SmithHealth Innovation Program, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USMile Bluff Medical Center · US

Funding

Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$32.2M
Advancing Integration of Tele-ophthalmology for Diabetic Retinopathy in Rural, Multi-payer Settings SupplementK23EY026518 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI LIU, YAO · 2016 to 2020
$879k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000427NEI NIH HHS K23 EY026518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDiabetic retinopathy remains the leading cause of blindness among working-age U.S. adults largely due to low screening rates. Rural populations face particularly greater challenges to screening because they are older, poorer, less insured, and less likely to receive guideline-concordant care than those in urban areas. Current patient education efforts may not fully address multiple barriers to screening faced by rural patients. We sought to characterize contextual factors affecting rural patient adherence with diabetic eye screening guidelines. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with 29 participants (20 adult patients with type 2 diabetes and 9 primary care providers) in a rural, multi-payer health system. Both inductive and directed content analysis were performed.

resultsFactors influencing rural patient adherence with diabetic eye screening were categorized as environmental, social, and individual using the Ecological Model of Health. Major themes included limited access to and infrequent use of healthcare, long travel distances to obtain care, poverty and financial tradeoffs, trusting relationships with healthcare providers, family members' struggles with diabetes, anxiety about diabetes complications, and the burden of diabetes management.

conclusionsSignificant barriers exist for rural patients that affect their ability to adhere with yearly diabetic eye screening. Many studies emphasize patient education to increase adherence, but current patient education strategies fail to address major environmental, social, and individual barriers. Addressing these factors, leveraging patient trust in their healthcare providers, and strategies targeted specifically to environmental barriers such as long travel distances (e.g. teleophthalmology) may fill crucial gaps in diabetic eye screening in rural communities.

Indexed as

Rural HealthAgedAged, 80 and overBlindnessDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic RetinopathyFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPatient CompliancePrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID30388172
PMCPMC6214545
OpenAlexW2898718493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.