Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30388158›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Validation of near infrared fluorescence (NIRF) probes in vivo with dual laser NIRF endoscope.

Manisha Shrivastav, Elias Gounaris, Mohammad W Khan, Jeffrey Ko, Stacy H Ryu, Matthew Bogyo, Andrew Larson, Terrence A Barret, David J Bentrem

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Manisha ShrivastavDepartment of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Elias GounarisDepartment of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8679-9711
Mohammad W KhanR.H. Lurie, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Jeffrey KoGastroenterology Division, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Stacy H RyuGastroenterology Division, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Matthew BogyoDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Andrew LarsonR.H. Lurie, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Terrence A BarretR.H. Lurie, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
David J BentremDepartment of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Northwestern University · USStanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe development of NIRF cathepsin activity probes offered the ability to visualize tumor associated tumor reaction and act as a surrogate marker to delineate the dysplastic lesions. One major type is a NIRF substrate of cathepsins (SBP), which is involved in catalytic way to produce high levels of fluorescence emission. The other major type (ABP) reacts with active cathepsins in stoichiometric manner since they bind covalently with their active center. Little is known about the sensitivity and the specificity of the NIRF probes to detect autochthonous developed dysplastic lesions. Dual laser NIRF endoscope provides a good tool to determine the efficiency of various NIRF probes in vivo in the same lesions. EXPERIMENTAL

designIn the current study, we validated both types of NIRF probes by using the dual laser NIRF endoscope to detect lesions colon cancer mouse model (TS4Cre/cAPC +/lox).

resultsThe dual laser NIRF endoscope is emitting equal power with both lasers. It can detect with the same efficiency in 680 mode, as well as, 750 mode when NIFR probes of the same scaffold in vivo. When SBP and ABP were used, our results showed both probes are efficient enough to detect large polyps but small dysplastic lesions could not efficiently imaged with the ABP.

conclusionsThe dual laser NIRF endoscope is a powerful tool to validate probes. The probes that react catalytically with the active center of cathepsins are more efficient than the ones that react stoichiometrically in detecting small lesions.

Indexed as

EndoscopesLasersAnimalsCathepsinsColonColonic NeoplasmsColonic PolypsDisease Models, AnimalFluorescent DyesMice, TransgenicOptical ImagingCathepsinsFluorescent Dyes

Identifiers

PMID30388158
PMCPMC6214553
OpenAlexW2899279918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.