Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30388145›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2018

Reported willingness to participate in a hypothetical HIV vaccine trial and its translation to actual participation among healthy adults-Experience from Kenya.

Delvin Kwamboka Nyasani, Gaudensia Nzembi Mutua, Rose Miroyo Sajabi, Jane Wairimu Ng'ang'a, John Ndungu Gachie, Amos Macharia Maina, Laura Lunani Lusike, Aggrey Omu Anzala, Matthew A Price, Gloria Omosa Manyonyi

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Delvin Kwamboka NyasaniKAVI-Institute of Clinical Research, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0001-7372-4577
Gaudensia Nzembi MutuaKAVI-Institute of Clinical Research, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Rose Miroyo SajabiKAVI-Institute of Clinical Research, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Jane Wairimu Ng'ang'aKAVI-Institute of Clinical Research, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
John Ndungu GachieKAVI-Institute of Clinical Research, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Amos Macharia MainaKAVI-Institute of Clinical Research, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Laura Lunani LusikeKAVI-Institute of Clinical Research, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Aggrey Omu AnzalaKAVI-Institute of Clinical Research, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Matthew A PriceInternational AIDS Vaccine Initiative, New York, United States of America.
Gloria Omosa ManyonyiDepartment of Microbiology, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.

Funding

Int'l Traineeships in AIDS Prevention Studies (ITAPS)R25MH064712 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LINDAN, CHRISTINA P · 2002 to 2018
$3.4M
NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH064712
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate initial reported willingness to participate in a hypothetical HIV vaccine clinical trial and actual participation of volunteers in a longitudinal observational study.

methodsWe recruited HIV negative male and female volunteers aged 18-45 years into a longitudinal observational study at KAVI-ICR Kangemi in Kenya, to serve as a pool from which to draw participants into a phase I HIV vaccine clinical trial. A structured questionnaire was used to collect information regarding willingness to join a HIV vaccine clinical trial in the future. Study follow-up visits were every 6 months.

resultsA total of 105 participants were screened and 100 (M46:F54) were enrolled into the observational study. Ninety- four per cent of those enrolled expressed willingness to participate in a future HIV vaccine trial. Altruism and desire to learn the body's response to the vaccine were the most motivating factors at 40% and 25% respectively. At the onset of a 40-person phase I HIV vaccine trial, 86 observational study participants who had previously expressed willingness to participate were contacted but only 26 (30%) came for information. All 26 consented to participate and after screening for eligibility, 24 were eligible. Of the 24, 15 were enrolled. These numbers were not adequate; hence the vaccine trial employed other recruitment methods to meet the deficit.

conclusionObservational "pools" of cohorts may not provide adequate number of participants into vaccine clinical trials even if they report willingness; therefore supplementary recruitment methods such as direct community recruitment, passive approach, and snowballing need to be in place.

Indexed as

AIDS VaccinesHIV InfectionsPatient SelectionAdolescentAdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansKenyaLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedMotivationSocioeconomic FactorsYoung AdultAIDS Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID30388145
PMCPMC6214541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.