ArticlePLoS genetics2018
Association analysis using somatic mutations.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Constructing gene similarity networks using co-occurrence probabilities.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- Associating somatic mutation with clinical outcomes through kernel regression and optimal transport.Biometrics · 2023Article
- Comprehensive pan-cancer analysis identifies FHL2 associated with poor prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma.Translational cancer research · 2023Article
- Privacy-preserving cancer type prediction with homomorphic encryption.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Immune Landscape and Classification in Lung Adenocarcinoma Based on a Novel Cell Cycle Checkpoints Related Signature for Predicting Prognosis and Therapeutic Response.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- A method for subtype analysis with somatic mutations.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- Mapping Tumor-Specific Expression QTLs in Impure Tumor Samples.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2020Article
- Correction: Association analysis using somatic mutations.PLoS genetics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Somatic mutations drive the growth of tumor cells and are pivotal biomarkers for many cancer treatments. Genetic association analysis using somatic mutations is an effective approach to study the functional impact of somatic mutations. However, standard regression methods are not appropriate for somatic mutation association studies because somatic mutation calls often have non-ignorable false positive rate and/or false negative rate. While large scale association analysis using somatic mutations becomes feasible recently-thanks for the improvement of sequencing techniques and the reduction of sequencing cost-there is an urgent need for a new statistical method designed for somatic mutation association analysis. We propose such a method with computationally efficient software implementation: Somatic mutation Association test with Measurement Errors (SAME). SAME accounts for somatic mutation calling uncertainty using a likelihood based approach. It can be used to assess the associations between continuous/dichotomous outcomes and individual mutations or gene-level mutations. Through simulation studies across a wide range of realistic scenarios, we show that SAME can significantly improve statistical power than the naive generalized linear model that ignores mutation calling uncertainty. Finally, using the data collected from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project, we apply SAME to study the associations between somatic mutations and gene expression in 12 cancer types, as well as the associations between somatic mutations and colon cancer subtype defined by DNA methylation data. SAME recovered some interesting findings that were missed by the generalized linear model. In addition, we demonstrated that mutation-level and gene-level analyses are often more appropriate for oncogene and tumor-suppressor gene, respectively.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.