Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30388102›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2018

Association analysis using somatic mutations.

Yang Liu, Qianchuan He, Wei Sun

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A method for subtype analysis with somatic mutations.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021
    Article
  7. Mapping Tumor-Specific Expression QTLs in Impure Tumor Samples.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yang LiuDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio, United States of America.
Qianchuan HeBiostatistics Program, Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Wei SunBiostatistics Program, Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6350-1107
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · USWright State University · US

Funding

Translational Bioimaging Core Shared ResourceP30CA015704 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Marian Esvelt · 1985 to 2026
$296.4M
Statistical Methods for Cancer Clinical TrialsP01CA142538 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAVIDIAN, MARIE, KOSOROK, MICHAEL R · 2010 to 2019
$21.3M
Statistical Methods for RNA-seq Data AnalysisR01GM105785 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Wei Sun · 2014 to 2026
$4.6M
Bayesian Approaches to Model Selection for Survival DataR01GM070335 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI IBRAHIM, JOSEPH G · 2003 to 2019
$4.0M
Methods for Analyzing Cancer Somatic Mutation DataR01CA223498 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI HE, QIANCHUAN · 2018 to 2022
$2.0M
Unlocking complex co-expression network using graphical modelsR01GM126550 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LIU, YUFENG · 2017 to 2020
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201000031CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201400008CNCI NIH HHS P01 CA142538NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015704NCI NIH HHS R01 CA223498NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM070335NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM105785NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM126550
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Somatic mutations drive the growth of tumor cells and are pivotal biomarkers for many cancer treatments. Genetic association analysis using somatic mutations is an effective approach to study the functional impact of somatic mutations. However, standard regression methods are not appropriate for somatic mutation association studies because somatic mutation calls often have non-ignorable false positive rate and/or false negative rate. While large scale association analysis using somatic mutations becomes feasible recently-thanks for the improvement of sequencing techniques and the reduction of sequencing cost-there is an urgent need for a new statistical method designed for somatic mutation association analysis. We propose such a method with computationally efficient software implementation: Somatic mutation Association test with Measurement Errors (SAME). SAME accounts for somatic mutation calling uncertainty using a likelihood based approach. It can be used to assess the associations between continuous/dichotomous outcomes and individual mutations or gene-level mutations. Through simulation studies across a wide range of realistic scenarios, we show that SAME can significantly improve statistical power than the naive generalized linear model that ignores mutation calling uncertainty. Finally, using the data collected from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project, we apply SAME to study the associations between somatic mutations and gene expression in 12 cancer types, as well as the associations between somatic mutations and colon cancer subtype defined by DNA methylation data. SAME recovered some interesting findings that were missed by the generalized linear model. In addition, we demonstrated that mutation-level and gene-level analyses are often more appropriate for oncogene and tumor-suppressor gene, respectively.

Identifiers

PMID30388102
PMCPMC6235399
OpenAlexW2898649334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.