ArticleJournal of Zhejiang University. Science. B
Towards a multidimensional scientific approach to improve clinical practices for infertility treatment.
Article in Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of Liraglutide in Obesity in Children and Adolescents: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Association between maternal polycystic ovary syndrome and early childhood growth: a continuous observation from 3 months to 6 years of age.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2022Article
- Fetal growth, fetal development, and placental features in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: analysis based on fetal and placental magnetic resonance imaging.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. BArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common metabolic and endocrine disorder in women, leading to infertility. However, there is no general agreement concerning how to diagnose and treat PCOS. The Rotterdam consensus statement from the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology/American Society for Reproductive Medicine, the Chinese diagnostic criteria and consensus statement, and the clinical practice guideline from the Endocrine Society in the USA are widely recognized. Guidance has been provided for clinical practice based on a comparative analysis of the above three practice guidelines or consensus statements (Wang et al., 2018a). High body mass index (BMI) has no negative effect on the outcome of in vitro fertilization (IVF) in Chinese patients with PCOS; however, the conclusion may be limited by the retrospective design and potential bias (Pan et al., 2018). Neonatal birth weight is positively affected by both maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index (pre-BMI) and gestational weight gain (Du et al., 2017). Normal body weight is very important for conception. Women with PCOS are almost 3 times more likely to be obese than those without PCOS; however, no specific interventions are available to induce weight loss, and drugs are used to treat other symptoms of the syndrome or obesity in the general population. A network meta-analysis found that the amount of weight loss differed significantly according to the choice of drugs (in descending order): liraglutide, orlistat, and metformin. Liraglutide alone, liraglutide/metformin, and metformin alone significantly reduced waist circumference, but no change was found with orlistat, indicating liraglutide appears superior to the other drugs in reducing weight and waist circumference (Wang et al., 2018b). IVF, as a choice for more than 1 000 000 infertile couples each year, gives rise to the birth of over 3 000 000 babies worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.