Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30387081›Full record

SynthesisDrugs in R&D2018

Efficacy and Safety of Budesonide in the Treatment of Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Non-Randomized Studies.

Prashanth Rawla, Tagore Sunkara, Krishna Chaitanya Thandra, Vinaya Gaduputi

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Drugs in R&D, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Eosinophilic esophagitis: Current concepts in diagnosis and management.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Systemic administration of budesonide in pegylated liposomes for improved efficacy in chronic rhinosinusitis.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Predictive factors for glucocorticoid therapy in children with eosinophilic gastroenteritis.Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Diagnosis and treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Prashanth RawlaDepartment of Internal Medicine, SOVAH Health, 320 Hospital Dr, Martinsville, VA, 24112, USA. rawlap@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4361-8498
Tagore SunkaraDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Brooklyn Hospital Center, 121 Dekalb Ave, Brooklyn, NY, 11201, USA.
Krishna Chaitanya ThandraDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Vinaya GaduputiDivision of Gastroenterology, SBH Health System, 4422 Third Ave, Bronx, NY, 19457, USA.
Brooklyn Hospital Center · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNorthwell Health · USSovah Health Martinsville · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveEosinophilic esophagitis (EE) is an immune/antigen-driven inflammation that causes esophageal dysfunction. Budesonide has shown promising effect in the management of EE in multiple studies, and we therefore conducted this systematic review/meta-analysis to assess budesonide efficacy and safety in order to provide more updated and robust evidence.

methodsIn April 2018, we conducted a systematic electronic search through four databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science (ISI), and Cochrane Central. All original studies reporting the efficacy of budesonide in the treatment of EE were included in our meta-analysis. The Cochrane Collaboration tool was employed to assess the risk of bias among included randomized controlled trials, while the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used for non-randomized studies.

resultsA total of 12 studies including 555 participants were included in our review. Budesonide showed marked efficacy at the level of histological response compared to placebo [risk ratio (RR) (95% confidence interval (CI)) 11.93 (4.82-29.50); p > 0.001]. Analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies revealed considerable reduction in eosinophil count, with a mean difference (MD) (95% CI) of - 69.41 (- 105.31 to - 33.51; p < 0.001) and 46.85 (33.93-59.77; p < 0.001), respectively. Similarly, there was a marked improvement in the clinical symptoms via the analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies, with an RR (95% CI) of 1.72 (1.22-2.41; p = 0.002) and MD (95% CI) of 2.45 (0.76-4.15; p = 0.005), respectively.

conclusionBudesonide showed significant effect at all treatment endpoints. However, since budesonide carries a risk of candidiasis and our inferences are based only on a small number of included studies, more research is warranted to clarify these results.

Indexed as

BudesonideEosinophilic EsophagitisHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBudesonide

Identifiers

PMID30387081
PMCPMC6277325
OpenAlexW2898934370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.