Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30387043›Full record

Trial reportDrugs & aging2018

Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Eslicarbazepine Acetate as Adjunctive Therapy in Patients Aged ≥ 65 Years with Focal Seizures.

Raquel Costa, Bernhard Steinhoff, Helena Gama, Fábio Ikedo, José-Francisco Rocha, Patrício Soares-da-Silva

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drugs & aging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Raquel CostaDepartment of Research and Development, BIAL-Portela & Cª, S.A., À Avenida da Siderurgia Nacional, 4745-457, Coronado (S. Romão e S. Mamede), Portugal.
Bernhard SteinhoffEpilepsy Center Kork, Landstrasse 1, 77694, Kehl, Germany.
Helena GamaDepartment of Research and Development, BIAL-Portela & Cª, S.A., À Avenida da Siderurgia Nacional, 4745-457, Coronado (S. Romão e S. Mamede), Portugal.
Fábio IkedoDepartment of Research and Development, BIAL-Portela & Cª, S.A., À Avenida da Siderurgia Nacional, 4745-457, Coronado (S. Romão e S. Mamede), Portugal.
José-Francisco RochaDepartment of Research and Development, BIAL-Portela & Cª, S.A., À Avenida da Siderurgia Nacional, 4745-457, Coronado (S. Romão e S. Mamede), Portugal.
Patrício Soares-da-SilvaDepartment of Research and Development, BIAL-Portela & Cª, S.A., À Avenida da Siderurgia Nacional, 4745-457, Coronado (S. Romão e S. Mamede), Portugal. psoares.silva@bial.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe incidence of epilepsy is high within the first few years of life, stabilizes over the second through fifth decades, and then rises again. Treatment of elderly patients with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is complicated by increased sensitivity to drug effects, altered pharmacokinetics and an increased risk for drug interactions due to polytherapy. On the other hand, the safety and efficacy data of AEDs attained during clinical development programmes are relatively limited for this age group.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) as adjunctive therapy in patients aged ≥ 65 years with focal-onset seizures (FOS).

methodsThis was an international, multicentre, open-label, non-controlled, single-arm, post-European approval commitment study with flexible doses of ESL between 400 and 1200 mg/day. Seventy-two elderly patients with at least two FOS in the prior 4 weeks, and treated with one or two AEDs, were enrolled. The study consisted of an 8-week baseline, followed by a 26-week treatment period during which the investigator was allowed to up- or down-titrate the ESL dose, and a 4-week follow-up period. Safety and tolerability were assessed as well as mental sedation, cognitive mental state and suicidal ideation. Efficacy was assessed based on patient diaries regarding the absolute and relative changes in seizure frequency, change in intellectual impairment and quality of life.

resultsOverall, 47 (65.3%) patients experienced 152 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). The most frequent were dizziness (12.5%), somnolence (9.7%), fatigue, convulsion and hyponatraemia (8.3% each). All patients that experienced hyponatraemia (6/72) recovered without sequelae. Three patients died during the study (due to cardiac failure, glioblastoma multiforme and ischaemic stroke, all considered unrelated to ESL). Overall, 16 (22.2%) patients discontinued prematurely due to TEAEs. The incidences of clinically significant findings were low for vital signs, ECG, physical and neurological examinations. No TEAEs of hypothyroidism were reported; however, 24 (33.3%) patients presented post-baseline shifts from normal to decreased free T4 levels (not clinically significant). ESL decreased standardized seizure frequency from a mean of 4.8 seizures at baseline to 3.6 seizures at endpoint (p > 0.05); and mean number of days with seizures significantly decreased from 4.1 (baseline) to 2.8 at endpoint (p = 0.0408).

conclusionESL taken once daily (400-1200 mg) as adjunctive therapy in patients aged ≥ 65 years was found to be safe, well tolerated and efficacious (EudraCT number: 2009-012587-14).

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAnticonvulsantsDibenzazepinesFemaleHumansMaleQuality of LifeSeizuresTreatment OutcomeAnticonvulsantsDibenzazepineseslicarbazepine acetate

Identifiers

PMID30387043
PMCPMC6267536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.