Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30387014›Full record

ArticlePathology oncology research : POR2019

Human Plasma Levels of VEGF-A, VEGF-C, VEGF-D, their Soluble Receptor - VEGFR-2 and Applicability of these Parameters as Tumor Markers in the Diagnostics of Breast Cancer.

Monika Zajkowska, Emilia Lubowicka, Wojciech Fiedorowicz, Maciej Szmitkowski, Jacek Jamiołkowski, Sławomir Ławicki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. VEGFR-Mediated Cytotoxic Activity ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Monika ZajkowskaDepartment of Biochemical Diagnostics, Medical University of Bialystok, Waszyngtona 15A, 15-269, Bialystok, Poland.
Emilia LubowickaDepartment of Esthetic Medicine, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-267, Bialystok, Poland.
Wojciech FiedorowiczDepartment of Oncological Surgery, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Oncology Center, 15-001, Bialystok, Poland.
Maciej SzmitkowskiDepartment of Biochemical Diagnostics, Medical University of Bialystok, Waszyngtona 15A, 15-269, Bialystok, Poland.
Jacek JamiołkowskiDepartment of Population Medicine and Civilization Diseases Prevention, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-269, Bialystok, Poland.
Sławomir ŁawickiDepartment of Biochemical Diagnostics, Medical University of Bialystok, Waszyngtona 15A, 15-269, Bialystok, Poland. slawicki@umb.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5179-0722

Funding

Uniwersytet Medyczny w Bialymstoku N/ST/MN/16/004/2207Uniwersytet Medyczny w Bialymstoku N/ST/MN/17/002/2207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

VEGF family members are important factors in promoting angio- and lymphangiogenesis. The aim of this study was to investigate concentrations, diagnostic utility and power of VEGF-A, VEGF-C, VEGF-D and VEGFR-2 in comparison to CA15-3 in breast cancer (BC) patients. The study included 120 BC patients and 60 control patients (28 with benign breast tumors and 32 healthy women). Plasma levels of tested parameters were determined by ELISA, CA15-3 by CMIA. Concentrations of all parameters showed statistical significance when compared BC patients to controls. VEGF-D showed the highest SE (82.50%) in total BC group. Highest SP and PPV in total BC group showed VEGF-A(76.67%;84.78%,respectively), but lower than CA15-3. Highest NPV showed VEGF-C(52.33%), but it was lower than CA15-3. VEGF-C was also the best parameter which had statistically significant AUC in total cancer group (0.7672), but also stages I(0.7684) and II(0.7772). In the total group of BC almost all tested parameters showed statistically significant AUC, but a maximum range was obtained for the combination of VEGF-C + CA15-3(0.8476). The combined analysis of tested parameters and CA15-3 resulted in increase in SE and AUC values, which provides hope for developing a new panel of biomarkers that may be used in the diagnosis of BC in the future.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedPrognosisROC CurveVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVascular Endothelial Growth Factor CVascular Endothelial Growth Factor DVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2Biomarkers, TumorKDR protein, humanVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVascular Endothelial Growth Factor CVascular Endothelial Growth Factor DVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2VEGFA protein, humanVEGFC protein, humanVEGFD protein, humanAUCDiagnostic utilityROCVEGF family members

Identifiers

PMID30387014
PMCPMC6815280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.