Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30387003›Full record

SynthesisBreast cancer research and treatment2019

A systematic review of interventions to improve adherence to endocrine therapy.

Sue P Heiney, Pearman D Parker, Tisha M Felder, Swann Arp Adams, Omonefe O Omofuma, Jennifer M Hulett

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Interventions to Promote Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy Adherence Among Breast Cancer Survivors.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Optimization of an Information Leaflet to Influence Medication Beliefs in Women With Breast Cancer: A Randomized Factorial Experiment.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2023
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Impact of motivational interviewing on psychosocial and symptom outcomes during breast cancer endocrine therapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Culturally appropriate patient-provider communication methods for Black women with breast cancer: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sue P HeineyCollege of Nursing, School of Medicine, University of South Carolina, 1601 Greene St, Columbia, 29208, SC, USA. heineys@mailbox.sc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0468-9795
Pearman D ParkerCollege of Nursing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA.
Tisha M FelderCollege of Nursing, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA.
Swann Arp AdamsCollege of Nursing, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA.
Omonefe O OmofumaArnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA.
Jennifer M HulettCollege of Nursing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA.

Funding

Improving Adherence to Adjuvant Hormonal Therapy among Disadvantaged Breast Cancer SurvivorsK01CA193667 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI FELDER, TISHA · 2015 to 2019
$631k
NCI NIH HHS K01 CA193667NCI NIH HHS K01CA193667Susan G. Komen GTDR17500160
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAdherence to endocrine therapy for hormone positive breast cancer is a significant problem, especially in minority populations. Further, endocrine therapy reduces recurrence and thus mortality. However, little data are available on interventions to improve adherence. The authors conducted a systematic review to examine the impact of interventions, strategies, or approaches aimed to improve endocrine therapy adherence among women with breast cancer. A secondary aim was to determine if interventions had any cultural modifications.

methodsTwo of the authors examined articles published between 2006 and 2017 from a wide variety of databases using Covidence systematic review platform.

resultsIn total, 16 eligible studies met criteria for review including 4 randomized controlled trials, 4 retrospective studies, and 8 with various observational designs. Eligible studies used a broad range of definitions for adherence and measured adherence by self-report, medical records, claims data, and combinations of these. All used 80% medication possession ratio as a standard for adherence. Patient information/education was the most frequent intervention strategy but did not demonstrate a significant effect except in one study. Significant results were noted when education was combined with communication strategies.

conclusionsResearchers need a standard definition for adherence and a reliable measure that is feasible to use in a variety of studies. While education may be a necessary component of an intervention, when used alone, it is not a sufficient approach to change behavior.

Indexed as

Medication AdherenceAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsClinical Studies as TopicFemaleHumansPublication BiasTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalAdherenceBreast cancerEndocrine therapyInterventionsSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID30387003
PMCPMC7093203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.