Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30386986›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2019

Real-time in vivo optical biopsy using confocal laser endomicroscopy to evaluate distal margin in situ and determine surgical procedure in low rectal cancer.

Zhangyuanzhu Liu, Xiaobei Luo, Wei Jiang, Dexin Chen, Weisheng Chen, Kai Li, Xiumin Liu, Ziming Cui, Zhiming Li, Zelong Han and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Real-timeWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2022
    Article
  2. Systematic interpretation of confocal laser endomicroscopy: larynx and pharynx confocal imaging score.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhangyuanzhu LiuDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Xiaobei LuoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Wei JiangDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Dexin ChenDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Weisheng ChenDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Kai LiDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Xiumin LiuDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Ziming CuiDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Zhiming LiDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Zelong HanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Side LiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Guoxin LiDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Chris XuSchool of Applied and Engineering Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA. cx10@cornell.edu.
Jun YanDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China. yanjunfudan@163.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9190-6777
Nanfang Hospital · CNCornell University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn low rectal cancer, a negative distal margin (DM) is necessary for R0 radical resection, and therefore, the choice of surgical procedure is dependent on whether the planned transection rectum has residual cancer or not. Currently, surgeons choose surgical procedures according to intraoperative in vitro DM frozen sections. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of real-time in vivo optical biopsy using confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) to evaluate DM in situ and determine the surgical procedure in low rectal cancer.

methodsOptical biopsy using CLE was performed when the rectum was dissected at the levator ani plane and rectum transection was ready. For negative DM, the surgical procedure of low anterior resection (LAR) was chosen. For positive DM, the surgical procedure of abdominoperineal resection (APR) was chosen. The specimen at the site of the planned transection rectum underwent intraoperative frozen section and routine pathological procedures.

resultsEighteen patients underwent real-time in vivo optical biopsy using CLE in surgery. Eleven patients' CLE images of DM showed a regular, round crypt, and round luminal opening covered by a simple layer of columnar epithelial cells and goblet cells. LAR was then performed. Pathology revealed that the 11 DMs were negative, and the median length of the DMs was 2.0 cm. The remaining seven patients' CLE images of the planned transection rectum showed the loss of crypt architecture and irregular epithelial layer with loss of goblet cells. APR was then performed. Pathology confirmed cancer invasion, and the median distance from tumor to dentate line was 1.0 cm. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CLE optical biopsy of DM were 85.71%, 100%, and 94.44%, respectively.

conclusionsIt is feasible to perform real-time in vivo optical biopsy using CLE to evaluate DM in situ and determine the surgical procedure in low rectal cancer.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiopsyEndoscopyFeasibility StudiesFemaleFrozen SectionsHumansMaleMargins of ExcisionMicroscopy, ConfocalMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRectal NeoplasmsRectumSensitivity and SpecificityConfocal laser endomicroscopyDistal marginIn vivoLow rectal cancerOptical biopsySurgical procedure

Identifiers

PMID30386986
OpenAlexW2898893030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.