Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30386978›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2020

Communicating Actively Responding Empathically (CARE): Comparison of Communication Training Workshops for Health Professionals Working in Cancer Care.

Jodie Nixon, Lyndal Gray, Jane Turner, Anne Bernard, Jessica Scaife, Bena Cartmill

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Communicating Actively, Responding Empathically (CARE): Perceptions of Cancer Health Professionals Attending Communication Training Workshops.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jodie NixonOccupational Therapy Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, Brisbane, 4102, Australia. jodie.nixon@health.qld.gov.au.ORCID 0000-0003-1470-8491
Lyndal GrayOccupational Therapy Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, Brisbane, 4102, Australia.
Jane TurnerFaculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4027, Australia.
Anne BernardQFAB Bioinformatics, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4027, Australia.
Jessica ScaifeCancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, Brisbane, 4102, Australia.
Bena CartmillSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accessing full-day communication skills training can be challenging for health professionals working in cancer care. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of Communicating Actively, Responding Empathically (CARE Express), a modified 2-h communication skills training course, across measures of health professional confidence, skills and attitudes. Cancer care health professionals (n = 147) were recruited from allied health, nursing and medical disciplines, using a partial randomisation to allocate to three arms: control, two-hour training (CARE Express) and 1-day training (CARE). Perceived confidence and skills were measured by self-report using a purpose-built scale, and written responses to a challenging clinical encounter were obtained at baseline, post-training and three-months post-training. Attitudes toward psychosocial issues were evaluated with the Physician Belief Scale at baseline and 3 months post-training. No changes were observed in the control group (n = 50) from baseline to 3 months follow-up. Participants in the CARE Express (n = 48) and CARE (n = 49) groups had significant improvement in confidence in identifying/responding to emotions between baseline and 3 months post-training (p < 0.001), as well as their attitude toward psychosocial care (p < 0.001). A significant increase in "acknowledging" responses from baseline to 3 months was also observed for CARE Express and CARE (p < 0.001), with no difference between groups. CARE Express and CARE resulted in changes in confidence in emotional identification/response, psychosocial focus and communication skills maintained at 3 months post-training. Whilst the 1-day workshop has been regarded as gold standard, this study has revealed positive outcomes with a modified 2-h version, thus offering a potential alternate training model.

Indexed as

CommunicationEmpathyEmotionsFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMedical OncologyNeoplasmsNon-Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicPilot ProjectsSelf ReportCancerCARECommunication trainingEmpathyPerson-centred care

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.