Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30386959›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular neuroscience : MN2018

Selection and Validation of Reference Genes for RT-PCR Expression Analysis of Candidate Genes Involved in Morphine-Induced Conditioned Place Preference Mice.

Qian Zhang, Mengting Zhang, Jiaqi Li, Hai Xiao, Dong Wu, Qiannan Guo, Yuwei Zhang, Hongdan Wang, Shengbin Li, Shixiu Liao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Stable Reference Gene Selection for RT-qPCR Analysis inBioMed research international · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Qian ZhangHenan Provincial Key Medical Laboratory of Genetics, Institute of Medical Genetics, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Mengting ZhangHenan Provincial Key Medical Laboratory of Genetics, Institute of Medical Genetics, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Jiaqi LiKey Laboratory of Environment and Genes Related to Diseases, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Hai XiaoHenan Provincial Key Medical Laboratory of Genetics, Institute of Medical Genetics, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Dong WuHenan Provincial Key Medical Laboratory of Genetics, Institute of Medical Genetics, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Qiannan GuoHenan Provincial Key Medical Laboratory of Genetics, Institute of Medical Genetics, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Yuwei ZhangHenan Provincial Key Medical Laboratory of Genetics, Institute of Medical Genetics, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Hongdan WangHenan Provincial Key Medical Laboratory of Genetics, Institute of Medical Genetics, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China. wanghongdan5495@163.com.
Shengbin LiKey Laboratory of Environment and Genes Related to Diseases, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China. altaishan@163.com.
Shixiu LiaoHenan Provincial Key Medical Laboratory of Genetics, Institute of Medical Genetics, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China. yichuansuolsx@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3126-0027
Zhengzhou University · CNXi'an Jiaotong University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China NFSC 81501336Science and Technology Development Program of Henan Province 182102310218Science and Technology Development Program of Henan Province 182102310503
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The expression of reference genes should be constitutively stable under the experimental conditions, so determining stable reference genes is critical for obtaining reliable results in gene expression studies. Morphine addiction persistently influences neurotransmitters and signal transduction systems, which may negatively alter behavioral responses at the cellular levels and interfere the expression of reference genes. In order to research morphine dependence, animal models are commonly used in physiology, pathology, and therapeutics field since human trials have many limitations. Therefore, it is necessary to select stable reference genes in standardized animal model. The objective of this study is to find out a set of optimal reference genes to standardize the gene expression of morphine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) mice. During the process, eight reference genes were chosen. Then, the stability of their expression in two different brain tissues (Caudate Putamen and Hippocampus) was tested in two developmental stages (puberty and adult) under two treatments (physiological saline as control and morphine). Based on two algorithm-based methods (geNorm and NormFinder), which can rank and assess the stability of expression of eight reference genes, thereby quantifying the transcriptional levels of these genes by high sensitive, specific, and accurate real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) assays.

Indexed as

Conditioning, ClassicalAnimalsGene Expression ProfilingHippocampusMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMorphineMorphine DependencePutamenReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionReference StandardsMorphineConditioned place preferenceMorphineReal-time quantitative reverse transcription PCRReference gene

Identifiers

PMID30386959
OpenAlexW2899267932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.