Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30386877›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2019

Validation of CSF free light chain in diagnosis and prognosis of multiple sclerosis and clinically isolated syndrome: prospective cohort study in Buenos Aires.

María Soledad Sáez, Juan Ignacio Rojas, María Victoria Lorenzón, Francisco Sánchez, Liliana Patrucco, Jimena Míguez, Carolina Azcona, Patricia Sorroche, Edgardo Cristiano

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Does CSF pleocytosis have a predictive value for disease course in MS?Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2019
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

María Soledad SáezCentral Laboratory, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Juan Ignacio RojasMultiple Sclerosis Center of Buenos Aires, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina. juan.rojas@hospitalitaliano.org.ar.
María Victoria LorenzónCentral Laboratory, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Francisco SánchezMultiple Sclerosis Center of Buenos Aires, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Liliana PatruccoMultiple Sclerosis Center of Buenos Aires, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Jimena MíguezMultiple Sclerosis Center of Buenos Aires, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Carolina AzconaNeurology Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Patricia SorrocheCentral Laboratory, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Edgardo CristianoMultiple Sclerosis Center of Buenos Aires, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objective was to evaluate the precision of kappa and lambda free light chains (KFLC and LFLC) in CSF for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) and prognosis of clinically isolated syndrome (CIS).

methodsCSF and serum samples from CIS, MS and other neurological non-MS disease were collected between 2015 and 2017. FLC concentrations were measured using immunoassay Freelite™. Results were correlated with the patients' diagnoses and ROC curve analysis was used to determine accuracy. In CIS patients, analysis of FLC were compared in CIS converters vs. non-converter during follow-up.

resultsIn the MS group (n = 41), the optimal cut-off for KFLC determined was 7 mg/L, with a diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of 95% and 97%, respectively. The optimal cut-off for LFLC was 0.7 mg/L, with a diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of 71% and 81%, respectively. 36 CIS patients were included; mean follow-up time was 28 ± 9 months, and 22 (61.1%) patients converted to MS. The median concentration of CSF K and LFLCs at CIS diagnosis was slightly higher in CIS-converters compared to non-converters, but this did not reach statistical significance (KFLC: median 7 ± 5.3 mg/L vs. 5 ± 2.3 mg/L, p = 0.11; LFLC 0.7 ± 0.33 mg/L vs. 0.5 ± 0.23 mg/L p = 0.16). A strong correlation was observed between the concentration of K and L FLCs at diagnosis and the change in PBVC during follow-up (r = 0.72 and r = 0.65, respectively).

conclusionKFLCs have a high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of MS. FLC concentrations at CIS diagnosis were not significantly higher in CIS-converters.

Indexed as

AdultBiomarkersDemyelinating DiseasesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunoglobulin kappa-ChainsImmunoglobulin lambda-ChainsMalePrognosisProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkersImmunoglobulin kappa-ChainsImmunoglobulin lambda-ChainsClinically isolated syndromeDiagnosisFree light chainsMultiple sclerosisProgression

Identifiers

PMID30386877
OpenAlexW2898806341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.