Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30386862›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2019

Individual differences in blink rate modulate the effect of instrumental control on subsequent Pavlovian responding.

Catherine A Hartley, Cesar A O Coelho, Emily Boeke, Franchesca Ramirez, Elizabeth A Phelps

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Catherine A HartleyDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, USA. cah369@nyu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0177-7295
Cesar A O CoelhoDepartamento de Psicobiologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Emily BoekeDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, USA.
Franchesca RamirezDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA.
Elizabeth A PhelpsDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, USA.

Funding

Preventing the return of fear in humans: Reconsolidation and controlR01MH097085 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI PHELPS, ELIZABETH ANYA · 2012 to 2016
$1.9M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH097085NIMH NIH HHS RO1MH097085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationalePavlovian conditioned responses to cues that signal threat are rapidly acquired and tend to persist over time. However, recent research suggests that the ability to actively avoid or exert control over an anticipated threat can diminish the subsequent expression of Pavlovian responses. Studies in animal models suggest that active avoidance behavior and its consequences may be mediated by dopaminergic function. In the present study, we sought to replicate the finding that active control over threat can attenuate subsequent Pavlovian responding in humans and conducted exploratory analyses testing whether individual differences in blink rate, a putative index of dopaminergic function, might modulate this effect.

methodsParticipants underwent Pavlovian aversive conditioning, followed immediately by one of two conditions. In the active avoidance condition, participants had the opportunity to actively prevent the occurrence of an anticipated shock, whereas in a yoked extinction condition, participants passively observed the cessation of shocks, but with no ability to influence their occurrence. The following day, the conditioned stimuli were presented without shock, but both groups of participants had no opportunity to employ active instrumental responses. Blink rate was measured throughout the task, and skin conductance responses served as our index of Pavlovian conditioned responding.

resultsConsistent with our previous findings, we observed that the group that could actively avoid the shock on day 1 exhibited attenuated recovery of Pavlovian conditioned responses. Further, we found that individuals in the active avoidance group with higher blink rates exhibited a more robust attenuation of spontaneous recovery.

conclusionThis finding suggests that individual variation in dopaminergic function may modulate the efficacy with which active avoidance strategies can attenuate reactive Pavlovian responses.

Indexed as

IndividualityAdolescentAdultAnimalsAttentionAvoidance LearningBlinkingConditioning, ClassicalExtinction, PsychologicalFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationRandom AllocationYoung AdultActive avoidanceConditioned responsesDopaminePavlovian learning

Identifiers

PMID30386862
PMCPMC6373194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.