ArticleSingapore medical journal2018
A comparison of Streptococcus agalactiae septic arthritis and non-Streptococcus agalactiae septic arthritis.
Article in Singapore medical journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Red Knee Riddle.Oman medical journal · 2025Article
- A Case of Dual Septic Foci in Both the Joint and Pleural Cavity Caused by Streptococcus agalactiae.Cureus · 2024Article
- Multiplexed bacterial pathogen detection and clinical characteristics of orthopedic infection in hospitalized patients.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024Article
- Invasive Streptococcus agalactiae Disease With Meningitis and Septic Arthritis in a Non-pregnant Patient.Cureus · 2022Article
- Group B Streptococcus Bacteremia Mimicking Synovitis, Acne, Pustulosis, Hyperostosis, and Osteitis (SAPHO) Syndrome.Cureus · 2022Article
- Diffuse-Type Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor of the Knee with Concurrent Polymicrobial Infection (Case reports in infectious diseases · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionStreptococcus agalactiae (Group B Streptococcus, GBS) is an uncommon cause of septic arthritis in the adult population. In recent years, there has been an increase in the incidence of GBS septic arthritis. This study aims to compare the clinical presentation, investigations, microbiology and outcome of management in patients with GBS and non-GBS septic arthritis.
methodsRetrospective review of hospital surgical records was done to identify all patients treated surgically at our institution from January 2011 to January 2016 for primary septic arthritis. Patients were categorised into two groups: those with culture-proven GBS septic arthritis and those with causative pathogens that were not GBS. Patients who were medically unfit for surgical intervention as well as those who declined interventional procedures were excluded from the study.
resultsA total of 83 patients were included in the study: 62 (74.7%) had non-GBS septic arthritis and 21 (25.3%) had GBS septic arthritis. Patients with GBS septic arthritis were more likely to have polyarticular involvement (p < 0.001) and involvement of less common sites such as the elbow joint. They were also more likely to have elevated inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein > 150 mg/L; p = 0.017) and positive blood cultures (p = 0.02), and were typically healthy adults with no medical comorbidities (p = 0.012).
conclusionPatients with GBS septic arthritis were more likely to present with polyarticular involvement, positive blood cultures and higher levels of C-reactive protein on admission, and tended to be healthier individuals with no medical comorbidities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.