Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30386853›Full record

ArticleProceedings of machine learning research2018

Automated Identification of Causal Moderators in Time-Series Data.

Min Zheng, Jan Claassen, Samantha Kleinberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of machine learning research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Min ZhengDepartment of Computer Science, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA.
Jan ClaassenDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Samantha KleinbergDepartment of Computer Science Stevens, Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA.

Funding

BIGDATA: Causal Inference in Large-Scale Time Series with Rare and Latent EventsR01LM011826 · NLM · THE TRUSTEES OF THE STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI KLEINBERG, SAMANTHA · 2013 to 2024
$3.3M
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011826
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Causal inference is often taken to mean finding links between individual variables. However in many real-world cases, such as in biological systems, relationships are more complex, with groups of factors needed to produce an effect, or some factors only modifying other relationships rather than producing outcomes alone. For instance, weight may alter the efficacy of a drug without causing side effects itself. Such moderating factors may change the timing, intensity, or probability of a causal relationship. Distinguishing moderators from genuine causes can lead to more effective medical interventions, and better strategies for bringing about a desired effect, since a moderator alone is ineffective. However, there have not yet been algorithms to automatically infer moderators in a large-scale automated way, and they cannot be easily read off from causal graphs. We introduce a set of temporal logic rules to automatically identify the asymmetric roles of causes and moderators in a computationally efficient manner. Experiments on simulated data demonstrate that even in challenging cases we can find moderators and avoid confounding, and on real neurological ICU data we show how the approach can find more descriptive and meaningful relationships than the state of the art.

Indexed as

causalityhealth informaticstime series

Identifiers

PMID30386853
PMCPMC6207199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.