ArticleAEM education and training2018
Virtual Reality as an Interview Technique in Evaluation of Emergency Medicine Applicants.
Article in AEM education and training, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Which, how, and what? Using digital tools to train surgical skills; a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgery open science · 2023Review
- Virtual Interviews During COVID-19: Perspectives of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery Program Directors.Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery · 2021Article
- Systems-Level Reforms to the US Resident Selection Process: A Scoping Review.Journal of graduate medical education · 2021Article
- Videoconference Interviews: A Timely Primary Care Residency Selection Approach.Journal of graduate medical education · 2020Article
- Which Applicant Factors Predict Success in Emergency Medicine Training Programs? A Scoping Review.AEM education and training · 2020Article
- Using virtual reality as a replacement for hospital tours during residency interviews.Medical education online · 2020Article
- Bug Busters: Who you gonna call? Professional development for healthcare simulation technology specialists.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2019Article
- Virtual Reality as an Interview Technique in Evaluation of Emergency Medicine Applicants.AEM education and training · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
need for innovationCurrent interviewing strategies and the standardized letter of evaluation may not provide enough insight into preferred resident characteristics. Emergency medicine (EM) residency programs are challenged with identifying trainees who can problem solve, communicate, and work well with fellow health professionals.
backgroundStructured interviews have previously been used and can help predict success but candidates have reported a negative impression with their use. OBJECTIVE OF INNOVATION: This structured virtual reality (VR) interviewing method was designed so that interviewers can observe the communication abilities, subtle personality traits, and teamwork skills of applicants interviewed at an EM residency program. DEVELOPMENT PROCESS: A consumer VR headset became available and in combination with an interactive team game was incorporated into a standardized team-based interview session. This session was designed to allow observation of candidates' communication, problem solving, and teamwork skills. IMPLEMENTATION PHASE: Surveys were collected to examine the satisfaction of EM residency applicants who participated in this novel standardized interviewing method using a VR headset. After the submission of rank lists, but prior to Match Day, those who interviewed were e-mailed a voluntary, anonymous, and confidential survey asking about their interview experience, specifically about the VR portion. The survey was sent to 102 applicants with 63 responses for a 62% response rate at the completion of the 2015 to 2016 interview season. OUTCOMES: Overall study findings suggested that participants had a highly favorable impression of the VR portion of the interview. Specifically, participants reported that this interview technique was appropriate and worthwhile. Additionally, participants attested that the Oculus portion of the interview gave insight to their work ethic, personality, and communication skills and how they work with others. REFLECTIVE DISCUSSION: The novel interviewing method used in this study allowed interviewers to gain insight beyond that of the paperwork and brief face-to-face interaction. Study findings suggest that interviewees accepted the use of this novel interview method. It has been incorporated into our interview process for three consecutive years.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.