Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30386824›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2018

Magnetic Resonance-based Response Assessment and Dose Adaptation in Human Papilloma Virus Positive Tumors of the Oropharynx treated with Radiotherapy (MR-ADAPTOR): An R-IDEAL stage 2a-2b/Bayesian phase II trial.

Houda Bahig, Ying Yuan, Abdallah S R Mohamed, Kristy K Brock, Sweet Ping Ng, Jihong Wang, Yao Ding, Kate Hutcheson, Molly McCulloch, Peter A Balter and 32 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03224000 (Bayesian Phase II Trial of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Radiotherapy Dose Adaptation in Human Papilloma Virus Positive Oropharyngeal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03224000 phase2active not recruitingnot on this map

Bayesian Phase II Trial of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Radiotherapy Dose Adaptation in Human Papilloma Virus Positive Oropharyngeal Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorM.D. Anderson Cancer CenterRan2018 to 2026Enrolled90ConditionsMalignant Neoplasms of Lip Oral Cavity and Pharynx, Oropharyngeal CancerArmsModified Barium Swallow (MBS), Swallowing Questionnaire, Symptom Questionnaire, Video-Strobe Procedure, MRI Guided Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) Planning
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

42 authors at 11 institutions in 5 countries.

Houda BahigUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Ying YuanUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Abdallah S R MohamedUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Kristy K BrockUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Sweet Ping NgUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Jihong WangUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Yao DingUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Kate HutchesonUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Molly McCullochUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Peter A BalterUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Stephen Y LaiUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Abrahim Al-MamganiNetherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Jan-Jakob SonkeNetherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Uulke A van der HeideNetherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Christopher NuttingRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
X Allen LiMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Jared RobbinsMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Mussadiq AwanMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Irene KaramSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.
Katherine NewboldInstitute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Kevin HarringtonInstitute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Uwe OelfkeInstitute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Shreerang BhideRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Marielle E P PhilippensUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Chris H J TerhaardUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Andrew J McPartlinThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Pierre BlanchardGustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Adam S GardenUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
David I RosenthalUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Gary B GunnUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Jack PhanUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Guillaume CazoulatUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Michalis AristophanousUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Kelli K McSpaddenUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
John A GarciaUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Cornelis A T van den BergUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Cornelis P J RaaijmakersUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Linda KerkmeijerUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Patricia DoornaertVU University Medical Center, de Boelelaan, Netherlands.
Sanne BlindeErasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Steven J FrankUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Clifton D FullerUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLDutch Cancer Society · NLInstitute of Cancer Research · GBMedical College of Wisconsin · USRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRSunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 19727Cancer Research UK 21993Medical Research Council MC_EX_MR/M009068/1Medical Research Council MR/M009068/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent standard radiotherapy for oropharynx cancer (OPC) is associated with high rates of severe toxicities, shown to adversely impact patients' quality of life. Given excellent outcomes of human papilloma virus (HPV)-associated OPC and long-term survival of these typically young patients, treatment de-intensification aimed at improving survivorship while maintaining excellent disease control is now a central concern. The recent implementation of magnetic resonance image - guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) systems allows for individual tumor response assessment during treatment and offers possibility of personalized dose-reduction. In this 2-stage Bayesian phase II study, we propose to examine weekly radiotherapy dose-adaptation based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluated tumor response. Individual patient's plan will be designed to optimize dose reduction to organs at risk and minimize locoregional failure probability based on serial MRI during RT. Our primary aim is to assess the non-inferiority of MRgRT dose adaptation for patients with low risk HPV-associated OPC compared to historical control, as measured by Bayesian posterior probability of locoregional control (LRC).

methodsPatients with T1-2 N0-2b (as per AJCC 7th Edition) HPV-positive OPC, with lymph node <3 cm and <10 pack-year smoking history planned for curative radiotherapy alone to a dose of 70 Gy in 33 fractions will be eligible. All patients will undergo pre-treatment MRI and at least weekly intra-treatment MRI. Patients undergoing MRgRT will have weekly adaptation of high dose planning target volume based on gross tumor volume response. The stage 1 of this study will enroll 15 patients to MRgRT dose adaptation. If LRC at 6 months with MRgRT dose adaptation is found sufficiently safe as per the Bayesian model, stage 2 of the protocol will expand enrollment to an additional 60 patients, randomized to either MRgRT or standard IMRT. DISCUSSION: Multiple methods for safe treatment de-escalation in patients with HPV-positive OPC are currently being studied. By leveraging the ability of advanced MRI techniques to visualize tumor and soft tissues through the course of treatment, this protocol proposes a workflow for safe personalized radiation dose-reduction in good responders with radiosensitive tumors, while ensuring tumoricidal dose to more radioresistant tumors. MRgRT dose adaptation could translate in reduced long term radiation toxicities and improved survivorship while maintaining excellent LRC outcomes in favorable OPC.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03224000; Registration date: 07/21/2017.

Indexed as

Adaptive radiotherapyHuman papilloma virusMagnetic resonance imaging guided radiotherapyOropharyngeal cancer

Identifiers

PMID30386824
PMCPMC6204434
OpenAlexW2888046158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.