Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30386785›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2018

Farmer Behavior and Gastrointestinal Nematodes in Ruminant Livestock-Uptake of Sustainable Control Approaches.

Fiona Vande Velde, Johannes Charlier, Edwin Claerebout

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Impact of dietary purple neem (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  6. Anthelmintic resistance against gastrointestinal nematodes: an emerging threat in cattle farms in Bangladesh.Journal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Proteomic insights into nematode-trapping fungiJournal of veterinary research · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The impact of parasitic diseases on dromedary camel (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Sustainable worm control in ruminants in Europe: current perspectives.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2024
    Article
  18. Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Biotic interactions in soil and dung shape parasite transmission in temperate ruminant systems: An integrative framework.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fiona Vande VeldeLaboratory of Parasitology, Department of Virology, Parasitology and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Johannes CharlierKreavet, Kruibeke, Belgium.
Edwin ClaereboutLaboratory of Parasitology, Department of Virology, Parasitology and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Ghent University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastrointestinal nematode (GIN) infections are a common constraint in pasture-based herds and cause a decrease in animal health, productivity and farm profitability. Current control practices to prevent production losses of GIN infections in livestock depend largely on the use of anthelmintic drugs. However, due to the continued use of these drugs over more than three decades, the industry is now increasingly confronted with nematode populations resistant to the available anthelmintics. This emerging anthelmintic resistance (AR) in cattle nematodes emphasizes the need for a change toward more sustainable control approaches that limit, prevent or reverse the development of AR. The uptake of diagnostic methods for sustainable control could enable more informed treatment decisions and reduce excessive anthelmintic use. Different diagnostic and targeted or targeted selective anthelmintic control approaches that slow down the selection pressure for anthelmintic resistance have been developed and evaluated recently. Now it is time to transform these insights into guidelines for sustainable control and communicate them across the farmer community. This article reviews the current uptake of such sustainable practices with a focus on farmer's socio-psychological factors affecting this uptake. We investigate communication as a possible tool to change current behavior and successfully implement more sustainable anthelmintic treatment strategies.

Indexed as

dairy farmers' behaviorgastrointestinal nematodessocial veterinary epidemiologysustainable nematode controltargeted communication

Identifiers

PMID30386785
PMCPMC6198092
OpenAlexW2896632306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.