Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30386766›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in chemistry2018

Recent Applications of Diversity-Oriented Synthesis Toward Novel, 3-Dimensional Fragment Collections.

Sarah L Kidd, Thomas J Osberger, Natalia Mateu, Hannah F Sore, David R Spring

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in chemistry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. 1,2,3-Triazoles as Biomimetics in Peptide Science.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Design and Synthesis of 56 Shape-Diverse 3D Fragments.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah L KiddDepartment of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Thomas J OsbergerDepartment of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Natalia MateuDepartment of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Hannah F SoreDepartment of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
David R SpringDepartment of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fragment-based drug discovery (FBDD) is a well-established approach for the discovery of novel medicines, illustrated by the approval of two FBBD-derived drugs. This methodology is based on the utilization of small "fragment" molecules (<300 Da) as starting points for drug discovery and optimization. Organic synthesis has been identified as a significant obstacle in FBDD, however, in particular owing to the lack of novel 3-dimensional (3D) fragment collections that feature useful synthetic vectors for modification of hit compounds. Diversity-oriented synthesis (DOS) is a synthetic strategy that aims to efficiently produce compound collections with high levels of structural diversity and three-dimensionality and is therefore well-suited for the construction of novel fragment collections. This Mini-Review highlights recent studies at the intersection of DOS and FBDD aiming to produce novel libraries of diverse, polycyclic, fragment-like compounds, and their application in fragment-based screening projects.

Indexed as

compound collectionsdiversity-oriented synthesisfragment-based drug discoverymedicinal chemistryorganic synthesis

Identifiers

PMID30386766
PMCPMC6198038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.